From: "Linus Lüssing" <linus.luessing@c0d3.blue>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Cc: Marek Lindner <mareklindner@neomailbox.ch>,
lemoer <freifunk@irrelefant.net>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [RFC maint v2] batman-adv: fix adding VLANs with partial state
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 23:12:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180522211214.GG15580@otheros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180511185723.20138-1-mareklindner@neomailbox.ch>
On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 02:57:23AM +0800, Marek Lindner wrote:
> Whenever a new VLAN is created on top of batman virtual interfaces
> the batman-adv kernel module creates internal structures to track
> the status of said VLAN. Amongst other things, the MAC address of
> the VLAN interface itself has to be stored.
>
> Without this change a VLAN and its infrastructure could be created
> while the interface MAC address is not stored without triggering
> any error, thus creating issues in other parts of the code.
>
> Prevent the VLAN from being created if the MAC address can not
> be stored.
>
> Fixes: 952cebb57518 ("batman-adv: add per VLAN interface attribute framework")
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner <mareklindner@neomailbox.ch>
I tested this patch but so far could not spot any issues either in
dmesg or logread.
I've added these patches to a branch for Gluon here:
https://github.com/T-X/gluon/tree/tt-vlan-patched
And used these images (warning, they have my SSH public added):
https://metameute.de/~tux/Freifunk/firmware/ffh-tt-patched/
I've tested with an isolated two nodes setup for now.
I started playing with restarting the network multiple times:
~~~~~
root@freifunk-b0487ae7f31e:~# rm /tmp/vlan-test.log; trap '' SIGPIPE; for i in `seq 1 30`; do echo "Starting network restart $i" >> /tmp/vlan-test.log; /etc/init.d/network restart; sleep 5; if batctl tl | grep " 0 \["; then echo "BROKEN - aborting" >> /tmp/vlan-test.log; batctl tl >> /tmp/vlan-test.log; sleep 3; echo "waiting..." >> /tmp/vlan-test.log; batctl tl >> /tmp/vlan-test.log; break; fi; done; echo "finished" >> /tmp/vlan-test.log
~~~~~
And the result is the following - which looks odd?
~~~~~
root@freifunk-b0487ae7f31e:~# cat /tmp/vlan-test.log
Starting network restart 1
Starting network restart 2
Starting network restart 3
BROKEN - aborting
[B.A.T.M.A.N. adv 2018.1, MainIF/MAC: primary0/66:c6:34:9d:58:43 (bat0/b0:48:7a:e7:f3:1e BATMAN_IV), TTVN: 1]
Client VID Flags Last seen (CRC )
9a:86:17:9c:5f:4f -1 [.P.X..] 0.000 (0x0ce60e81)
b0:48:7a:e7:f3:1e 0 [.PN...] 0.000 (0x00000000)
b0:48:7a:e7:f3:1e -1 [.PN...] 0.000 (0x0ce60e81)
waiting...
[B.A.T.M.A.N. adv 2018.1, MainIF/MAC: primary0/66:c6:34:9d:58:43 (bat0/b0:48:7a:e7:f3:1e BATMAN_IV), TTVN: 2]
Client VID Flags Last seen (CRC )
b0:48:7a:e7:f3:1e 0 [.P....] 0.000 (0xc4c7d9cf)
b0:48:7a:e7:f3:1e -1 [.P....] 0.000 (0x62afdc24)
finished
~~~~~
However, this oddity seems to be temporary, now the local TT looks
just fine, without having rebooted the node:
~~~~~
root@freifunk-b0487ae7f31e:~# batctl tl
[B.A.T.M.A.N. adv 2018.1, MainIF/MAC: primary0/66:c6:34:9d:58:43 (bat0/b0:48:7a:e7:f3:1e BATMAN_IV), TTVN: 4]
Client VID Flags Last seen (CRC )
33:33:ff:40:f8:dc -1 [.P....] 0.000 (0xd118c666)
b0:48:7a:e7:f3:1e 0 [.P....] 0.000 (0xc4c7d9cf)
33:33:00:00:00:02 -1 [.P....] 0.000 (0xd118c666)
33:33:ff:00:00:01 -1 [.P....] 0.000 (0xd118c666)
33:33:00:02:10:01 -1 [.P....] 0.000 (0xd118c666)
01:00:5e:00:00:01 -1 [.P....] 0.000 (0xd118c666)
b0:48:7a:e7:f3:1e -1 [.P....] 0.000 (0xd118c666)
33:33:ff:e7:f3:1e -1 [.P....] 0.000 (0xd118c666)
33:33:00:00:00:01 -1 [.P....] 0.000 (0xd118c666)
~~~~~
Or is it expected that a TT VLAN entry with an "N" flag will have
the CRC set to 0x00000000?
I also noticed that the VLAN 0 is added to bat0 by 8021q right
after bat0 gets created and activated:
~~~~~
Sun Feb 25 14:20:28 2018 kern.info kernel: [ 7852.985327] batman_adv: bat0: Adding interface: primary0
Sun Feb 25 14:20:28 2018 kern.info kernel: [ 7852.990712] batman_adv: bat0: Interface activated: primary0
Sun Feb 25 14:20:28 2018 kern.info kernel: [ 7853.025080] 8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device bat0
Sun Feb 25 14:20:28 2018 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'bat0' is enabled
Sun Feb 25 14:20:28 2018 kern.info kernel: [ 7853.038815] device bat0 entered promiscuous mode
Sun Feb 25 14:20:28 2018 kern.info kernel: [ 7853.043649] br-client: port 3(bat0) entered forwarding state
Sun Feb 25 14:20:28 2018 kern.info kernel: [ 7853.049388] br-client: port 3(bat0) entered forwarding state
Sun Feb 25 14:20:28 2018 daemon.notice netifd: Network device 'bat0' link is up
Sun Feb 25 14:20:28 2018 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'bat0' has link connectivity
Sun Feb 25 14:20:28 2018 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'bat0' is setting up now
Sun Feb 25 14:20:28 2018 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'bat0' is now up
~~~~~
Which looks like it might have the potential for a race condition?
Also the "HW filter" remark by 8021q seems a bit odd as this is a
virtual interface, doesn't it?
Regards, Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-22 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-11 18:57 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [RFC maint v2] batman-adv: fix adding VLANs with partial state Marek Lindner
2018-05-22 21:12 ` Linus Lüssing [this message]
2018-09-07 10:13 ` Antonio Quartulli
2018-09-07 10:25 ` Marek Lindner
2019-06-09 11:23 ` Sven Eckelmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180522211214.GG15580@otheros \
--to=linus.luessing@c0d3.blue \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
--cc=freifunk@irrelefant.net \
--cc=mareklindner@neomailbox.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox