From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Simon Wunderlich Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 18:49:53 +0100 Message-ID: <2309579.S6OkIGZQ1N@prime> In-Reply-To: <54D4B9DE.8010605@altermundi.net> References: <54D4B9DE.8010605@altermundi.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1728007.LxLGYsvqUu"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] wireshark-batman-adv dissector for v15 Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org --nextPart1728007.LxLGYsvqUu Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Friday 06 February 2015 09:55:58 Gui Iribarren wrote: > On 06/02/15 09:38, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > > I can only talk about the simple two node installation I had when I= >=20 > was forced >=20 > > to write the wireshark-batman-adv dissector for v15. >=20 > last week i lurked the internet for this, without success. > Is it published in a place so obvious i couldn't imagine? > Is it published at all? >=20 > I'm hoping to find a BLA2 crazy loop :grin: but only looking at ARP > packets it's not evident where the problem is :) >=20 > thanks for any pointer! We did upstream it: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-commits/201411/msg00249.html not sure if this is in any release yet, though. Worst case, compile wir= eshark=20 from=20trunk, that's always fun. :D Cheers, Simon --nextPart1728007.LxLGYsvqUu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEABECAAYFAlTU/sUACgkQrzg/fFk7axZg0wCeKRU5tQm9nerSmAli0mOsy0jH +ZMAn3pWGHzLE/s7XZ7zk69iO2zb0AAp =81Yy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1728007.LxLGYsvqUu--