From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Simon Wunderlich Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 02:25:22 +0200 Message-ID: <2457781.aV3nu67AfV@prime> In-Reply-To: <1438896208.1369.49.camel@nord-west.org> References: <20150516220736.2d896b4b@i3.local> <1965971.qMo8ZFc46n@voltaire> <1438896208.1369.49.camel@nord-west.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5019287.lR2QcBvR56"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Patch to add mesh_no_rebroadcast List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org --nextPart5019287.lR2QcBvR56 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Hi Bjoern, there wasn't any activity on this patch (at least from our side), and t= here=20 wasn't any reaction on Mareks suggestion to add more explanation to the= patch. If you want to get it adopted, please resend it (rebased on current mas= ter)=20 with a proper commit message explaining what it does and why its useful= - like=20 we have for any other patch. Thanks, Simon On Thursday 06 August 2015 23:23:28 Bjoern Franke wrote: > Hi, >=20 > > It might be a good idea to send an explanation with the patch to ge= t > > the > > discussion started. What are the arguments in favor of this patch ?= A > > little > > more than 'Patch to add mesh_no_rebroadcast' would be nice. >=20 > Is there any advance towards including this patch? >=20 > Regards > Bj=F6rn --nextPart5019287.lR2QcBvR56 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEABECAAYFAlXD+vYACgkQrzg/fFk7axbYMACfXsQT8elnQmLI70yoPdziiCNR QeAAn1h2vaqEo+whZtUMpZcw5kVkFJ4V =Orvi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5019287.lR2QcBvR56--