public inbox for b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de>
To: Antonio Quartulli <a@unstable.cc>
Cc: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] bat0 trunk vlans?
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 10:38:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3144822.pnbq1OJLDA@prime> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170209074417.GG11922@prodigo.lan>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1700 bytes --]

On Thursday, February 9, 2017 3:44:17 PM CET Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 08:33:13AM +0100, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> > On Mittwoch, 8. Februar 2017 16:40:38 CET dan wrote:
> > > Assuming MTU is great enough (1528 right? 1500+24 batman-adv+4 VLAN),
> > > can the bat0 interface act as trunk for VLANs?
> > > 
> > > 2 Nodes:
> > > bat0:
> > > eth1
> > > 
> > > bridge0:
> > > eth0|bat0
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > device connected to node1-eth0 tags vlan20, does that traverse the
> > > bat0 mesh and come out node2-eth0 with tag in-tact?  Does it traverse
> > > node1-eth0 at all?
> > 
> > Afaik, the VLANs not on configured on batX will be rejected since TT was
> > made VLAN aware [1]. I think Simon and Antonio can clarify this.
> 
> I agree with Sven. The Translation Table (TT) component should complain by
> printing the message that you can see in the link.
> 
> This happens because TT needs to know about all the VLANs in order to learn
> the MAC addresses of the clients.
> 
> However, TT gets to know a new VLAN only when this is actually created (i.e.
> by creating bat0.X).
> 
> 
> The solution would be to create a VLAN on top of bat0 (i.e. bat0.20) and let
> the tagging happen at the node.

To be a bit more precise, do something like this on each node:

vconfig add bat0 20
vconfig add eth0 20
brctl addbr bridge-vlan20
brctl addif bat0.20
brctl addif eth0.20

repeat those steps for other VLANs you want to use.

We are aware that this is not "proper trunking" - I would think it would be 
better to let batman-adv automatically detect and handle VLANs in the TT code. 
But this isn't done currently, so you need to cope with this workaround.

Cheers,
     Simon

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2017-02-09  9:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-08 23:40 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] bat0 trunk vlans? dan
2017-02-09  7:33 ` Sven Eckelmann
2017-02-09  7:44   ` Antonio Quartulli
2017-02-09  9:38     ` Simon Wunderlich [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3144822.pnbq1OJLDA@prime \
    --to=sw@simonwunderlich.de \
    --cc=a@unstable.cc \
    --cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox