From: Simon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de>
To: Jake.Harris@zf.com
Cc: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] broadcast storms
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 20:17:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3795505.rC9BEUj0Hg@prime> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B99A1AB9A294834C8DF94185A5E9D18101784D0848@NRTV96002.america.zf-world.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4078 bytes --]
Hello Jake,
I've checked your pcap files. I couldn't find a culprit directly, but it seems
like you are having so many repetitions / the network is getting so overloaded
that broadcasts stay in the queues of your WiFi driver for longer than 30
seconds (possibly in different devices, accumulated). At this point, batman-
adv assumes that the device has rebooted and the sequence number is validly
re-used, thus circumventing the broadcast duplicate check.
You could increase the define of BATADV_RESET_PROTECTION_MS to something
higher like 120000 (120 seconds) and see if that helps. But the "right" way
would be to avoid those deep queues in the first place.
Do you set a multicast rate higher than the default 1 MBit/s? If not, that's
worth a try. :) If you are using iw, there is a "mcast-rate" parameter, and
there is something equivalent in wpa_supplicant.
Cheers,
Simon
On Monday, October 22, 2018 5:27:28 PM CEST Jake.Harris@zf.com wrote:
> Generated this via:
> sudo tcpdump -s 2000 -w /media/pi/KINGSTON/my.pcap -i
> wlx681ca2083fa4
>
> message after ^c
> 12090 packets captured
> 12251 packets received by filter
> 0 packets dropped by kernel
> 27 packets dropped by interface
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de>
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 10:27
> To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
> Cc: Harris Jake LPR <Jake.Harris@zf.com>
> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] broadcast storms
>
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> Hi Jake,
>
> could you make some pcap dumps on the wlan device where batman runs, and
> provide that to us? Just the the full tcpdump (tcpdump -s 2000 -w
> /tmp/my.pcap wlan0, assuming that wlan0 is your interface), not batctl
> dump? Then we can check sequence numbers etc in wireshark.
>
> Do you have some of your mesh nodes connected and bridged to Ethernet? If
> yes, you should check the bridge loop avoidance which could also be causing
> this effect, if you don't have it enabled and use such a topology:
>
> https://www.open-mesh.org/projects/batman-adv/wiki/Bridge-loop-avoidance-II
>
> Cheers,
> Simon
>
> On Monday, October 22, 2018 1:07:29 PM CEST Jake.Harris@zf.com wrote:
> > I'm sure a similar question to this has been answered, but I am new to
> > this mailing list format and don't know an efficient way to search
> > https://lists.open-mesh.org/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n/
> >
> > I'm having problems with broadcast messages effectively echoing around
> > the network of 50ish nodes. I attached a few seconds of the batctl
> > tcpdump output. I can't seem to find a pattern to what causes this, it
> > tends to happen once every two or three weeks, the storm causes
> > problems with the batman program where during the storm nodes drop all
> > their neighbors (batctl n shows an empty list) indefinitely, which I
> > have worked around that issue via a batch script that reloads batman
> > if the neighbor list is empty. Reloading successfully reconnects to
> > the network but the storm still persists.
> >
> > The only way I've found to fix this is to reboot all the nodes at the
> > same time such that the whole network is down to kill the echos.
> >
> > I believe I had this problem much more frequently (every 4 days or so)
> > a while ago on the same network when using discrete tcp destinations
> > for the nodes to communicate, the storm frequency was reduced to what
> > it is now by using broadcast packets and reducing the communication
> > rate from 12 seconds to once every 40 seconds.
> >
> > Rebooting the nodes that are responsible for the echoing messages has
> > no effect, I rebooted 192.168.1.230 before running tcpdump that is
> > attached and as it shows packets from 230 continued to bounce around
> > while the node was powered off and after it rejoined the network. It
> > doesn't appear broadcast uses a time-to-live parameter to limit the
> > hops the packets will make.
> >
> > I'm at a loss for a way to remedy this, there seems to only be
> > multicast optimizations.
>
> * Unknown Key
> * 0x42929EA1
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-22 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-22 13:07 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] broadcast storms Jake.Harris
2018-10-22 14:26 ` Simon Wunderlich
2018-10-22 17:27 ` Jake.Harris
2018-10-22 18:17 ` Simon Wunderlich [this message]
2018-11-12 14:29 ` Jake.Harris
2018-11-12 17:13 ` Simon Wunderlich
2018-11-13 14:55 ` Jake.Harris
2018-11-13 15:26 ` Simon Wunderlich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3795505.rC9BEUj0Hg@prime \
--to=sw@simonwunderlich.de \
--cc=Jake.Harris@zf.com \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox