From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Marek Lindner Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:52:45 +0800 Message-ID: <3844641.7Py5KLv2R0@diderot> In-Reply-To: References: <7903470.eFDOnKYHmK@diderot> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3553506.e5zMJYWvux"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] QoS in BATMAN-adv Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking --nextPart3553506.e5zMJYWvux Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Monday 28 July 2014 11:20:02 Krishnathiepan Rasanayagam wrote: > We are trying to determine is batman-adv is suitable for providing QoS > in MANETs. such as Voice and Video (VoIP and video streaming). And ? Any results yet ? Cheers, Marek --nextPart3553506.e5zMJYWvux Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAABAgAGBQJT1fNCAAoJEFNVTo/uthzA3UIH+gLiZmxuUg3DaUfGwPtjKL+1 gZTT3idFLFegGz4I0apwAJSvrpYtZ2KOhY7l+LJz274sHZXU3k9qMlpd67USAbEn s+YsyPykLiF3hLUuFm+Hks7riqi7kWRbyVAsGfYUtSVTQsMn0XK2fE2X482KCDB6 BxMN7ij/gjS/lBTLDBI14b6396scJ+vNcIwIdlZpNI9Rczf5y7hfF8GvaynCAdk8 7mFCxRoqSVWlevdxNDlWnpAogqIShjPHMOjGgKdNSk38zCd3c6uDvjheu0+QuXgI kOwIHDUFoHmMtNwTE9zHAkMS9MsE6d0EVniZefiB+ZKBEHToHtuzOF2eSferofg= =1UZ5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3553506.e5zMJYWvux--