From: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
To: no name <keinepostnurmuell@gmail.com>
Cc: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Super high package loss and weak connection
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 18:30:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3922831.NrCxltvcVr@sven-edge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKrZ8yffDYcr6UCw2Yv7hqUFEBNZQ+nTU09dovL=PO3+Zqy7ig@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1167 bytes --]
On Friday 18 December 2015 18:22:40 no name wrote:
> I made a little table were I tried wheezy against jessy and 802.11 as
> someone suggested earlier in the mailing list to me. I placed the
> raspberries next to each other on my table and tested through different
> settings:
>
> ad-hoc+batman-2014.X@debian wheezy: 1m distance .. 200 pings, 0%
> paket loss, reply time -> (min,avg,max,mdev 1.2ms, 1.8ms, 6.4ms, 0.8ms)
> ad-hoc+batman-2015.2@debian jessie: 1m distance .. 200 pings,
> 6% paket loss, reply time -> (min,avg,max,mdev 1.1ms, 170ms, 1400ms, 370ms)
> 802.11s @debian jessie: 1m distance ..
> 200 pings, 0% paket loss, reply time -> (min,avg,max,mdev 1.05ms, 1.8ms,
> 14ms, 1.5ms)
Your "table" is incomplete. adhoc without batman-adv and meshpoint (802.11s
without fwding+ttl=1)+batman-adv are missing. You also mixed two different
batman-adv versions. Either you use the same batman-adv version everywhere or
make sure that the kernel+wifi driver doesn't change. Changing multiple
variables between two tests tests make the results more or less useless for
comparisons.
Kind regards,
Sven
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-18 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-17 20:52 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Super high package loss and weak connection no name
2015-12-17 23:02 ` Ruben Kelevra
2015-12-18 13:23 ` no name
2015-12-18 13:43 ` Sven Eckelmann
2015-12-18 14:20 ` no name
2015-12-18 14:42 ` Sven Eckelmann
2015-12-18 16:12 ` no name
2015-12-18 16:40 ` Sven Eckelmann
[not found] ` <CAKrZ8yffDYcr6UCw2Yv7hqUFEBNZQ+nTU09dovL=PO3+Zqy7ig@mail.gmail.com>
2015-12-18 17:30 ` Sven Eckelmann [this message]
2015-12-21 15:35 ` no name
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-12-29 12:42 no name
[not found] ` <CAO9R-ZajkZRq-4==N3Y9aXkRCc3AhmPQiB_P4gSfKtu0X9W5tg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAO9R-ZZ=NT2Mh-OYtUpsZOYV=FHVjZjta+W1KeJU-v+HRgKaKg@mail.gmail.com>
2015-12-30 19:14 ` no name
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3922831.NrCxltvcVr@sven-edge \
--to=sven@narfation.org \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
--cc=keinepostnurmuell@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox