From: Simon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCHv2 7/7] batman-adv: handle race condition for claims between gateways
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 15:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4750317.OxPK4g4mQE@prime> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1456492790-29897-1-git-send-email-apape@phoenixcontact.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1768 bytes --]
Hi Andreas,
On Friday 26 February 2016 14:19:50 Andreas Pape wrote:
> Consider the following situation which has been found in a test setup:
> Gateway B has claimed client C and gateway A has the same backbone
> network as B. C sends a broad- or multicast to B and directly after
> this packet decides to send another packet to A due to a better TQ
> value. B will forward the broad-/multicast into the backbone as it is
> the responsible gw and after that A will claim C as it has been
> chosen by C as the new gateway. If it now happens that A claims C
> before it has received the broad-/multicast forwarded by B (due to
> backbone topology or due to some delay in B when forwarding the
> packet) we get a critical situation: in the current code A will
> immediately unclaim C when receiving the multicast due to the
> roaming client scenario although the position of C has not changed
> in the mesh. If this happens the multi-/broadcast forwarded by B
> will be sent back into the mesh by A and we have looping packets
> until one of the gateways claims C again.
> In order to prevent this, unclaiming of a client due to the roaming
> client scenario is only done after a certain time is expired after
> the last claim of the client. 100 ms are used here, which should be
> slow enough for big backbones and slow gateways but fast enough not
> to break the roaming client use case.
That's an interesting solution. My original idea was to make clients "race"
for clients, which wasn't ever implemented because in the scenarios I tested
this was not a problem (Check batadv_bla_rx(), there is a note on a possible
optimization).
I believe your solutions looks valid, let's implement that.
Acked-by: Simon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de>
Thanks,
Simon
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-10 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-26 13:19 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCHv2 7/7] batman-adv: handle race condition for claims between gateways Andreas Pape
2016-03-10 14:55 ` Simon Wunderlich [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4750317.OxPK4g4mQE@prime \
--to=sw@simonwunderlich.de \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox