From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4751A22D.3060207@leipzig.freifunk.net> Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 19:04:29 +0100 From: tetzlav MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] rv791 <---> rv824 incompatible? References: <4750C29B.6030708@leipzig.freifunk.net> <200712011837.46218.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> In-Reply-To: <200712011837.46218.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Marek Lindner schrieb: >>> [ 7946500] Is an internet gateway (class 1) >>> [ 7946510] Drop packet: incompatible batman version (105) >>> > > In revision 812 the header format was changed due to future compability issues > (the version field is now the first field in the header). > I'm sorry about the inconvenience - it wont happen too often. :-/ just this minute we included batmand-0.3 rv791 in our Leipziger Freifunk-Firmware and now the newer Versions are incompatible with this included version... So wie never get an big connected batman-testbed in Leipzig in near Future, because i think the the users wont update as often as batmand-compat change. The rv791 routes fine, but gateway make some Problems. So we included this testet version and only request the users that _want_ to use batman-gateway-tunnel tu update their batmand. (updatecheck is includet) -> now our Plans are broken... :-( Why you dont enlarge the compat# from 4 to 5, or so? Thats confusing, sorry... Regards tetzlav