public inbox for b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chris W." <chris-wy@web.de>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
	<b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] 0.3.1 rv1152 - some test results
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:41:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4939136F.9000800@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200812011230.01187.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

Hello there,

meanwhile with  rv 1172  the previously mentioned issues concerning 
wrong or double routing entries are solved: nodes and announced networks 
are reachable on broadcom and on atheros devices and the gateway tunnel 
works as described when NAT'ed.
Great, thanx !

The sip test with NAT is still to come.

best regards,
Chris


Marek Lindner schrieb:
> On Saturday 29 November 2008 06:31:25 Chris W. wrote:
>> Uh, this would mean double NAT in the network, sip phones don't like it.
> 
> I overlooked that comment thats why my answer comes a bit late:
> 
> Are you sure that the batman setup is a problem for SIP ? I'm definitely not 
> the SIP expert but I don't think it is a problem (correct me if I'm wrong).
> 
> The normal double NAT setup looks like this:
> 
> NET_A -> NET_B -> Internet
> 
> SIP & STUN get in trouble here.
> 
> 
> In the batman network it looks a bit different:
> 
> NET_A -> NET_B -> NET_A -> Internet
> 
> The second NAT is used for internal transport only. I guess STUN will not 
> notice that there is the second network in between. Could you verify that ?
> 
> Regards,
> Marek
> 
> _______________________________________________
> B.A.T.M.A.N mailing list
> B.A.T.M.A.N@open-mesh.net
> https://list.open-mesh.net/mm/listinfo/b.a.t.m.a.n
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2008-12-05 11:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-26 23:30 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] 0.3.1 rv1152 - some test results Chris W.
2008-11-27 16:43 ` Marek Lindner
2008-11-28 17:51   ` Chris W.
2008-11-28 18:53     ` Chris W.
2008-11-28 20:07       ` Simon Wunderlich
2008-11-28 20:51     ` Simon Wunderlich
2008-11-28 22:31       ` Chris W.
2008-11-29  0:35         ` Marek Lindner
2008-11-30 22:43           ` Chris W.
2008-12-01  4:19             ` Marek Lindner
2008-12-02  8:54               ` Chris W.
2008-12-01  4:30         ` Marek Lindner
2008-12-05 11:41           ` Chris W. [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4939136F.9000800@web.de \
    --to=chris-wy@web.de \
    --cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox