From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <49C49C1A.6050100@java-system.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 08:49:46 +0100
From: marco tozzini <lists@java-system.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <49C40762.3050109@java-system.com>
	<200903210917.54806.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
In-Reply-To: <200903210917.54806.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] What do you think of this result?
Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
	<b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net>
List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
	<b.a.t.m.a.n.open-mesh.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.open-mesh.net/mm/options/b.a.t.m.a.n>,
	<mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@open-mesh.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.open-mesh.net/pipermail/b.a.t.m.a.n>
List-Post: <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net>
List-Help: <mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@open-mesh.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.open-mesh.net/mm/listinfo/b.a.t.m.a.n>,
	<mailto:b.a.t.m.a.n-request@open-mesh.net?subject=subscribe>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking <b.a.t.m.a.n@open-mesh.net>

Marek Lindner wrote:
> On Saturday 21 March 2009 05:15:14 marco tozzini wrote:
>   
>> and this is the results
>> 192.168.2.200 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 1000/928/7%, min/avg/max = 1.23/2.04/92.8
>> 192.168.2.201 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 1000/759/24%, min/avg/max = 1.28/3.11/27.5
>> 192.168.2.203 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 1000/766/23%, min/avg/max = 1.33/3.36/38.7
>>
>> I don't think it's normal, isn't it?
>>     
>
> What exactly are you referring to ? Are you wondering why the packet loss of 
> fping is higher than predicted by batman ?
>
> Regards,
> Marek
>
>   
Hi Merek
 From batman debug output it seems batman station has a good view one to 
each other, but working on this systems is very annoying:
ssh terminal has a wobbling response to commands

Is this the behavior I shall expect from a good working mesh system?

Ciao
Marco