From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <4A60FE9A.8040403@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:43:38 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Sebasti=E1n_D=2E_Criado=22?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8c906fa50907160755g41d2e437m11fa02c7fdde8cfb@mail.gmail.com> <200907172154.13655.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> <4A6094C9.8020109@gmail.com> <200907180252.07997.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> In-Reply-To: <200907180252.07997.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] VIS labels Reply-To: sebastian.criado@gmail.com, The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking El 17/07/09 15:52, Marek Lindner escribi=F3: > On Friday 17 July 2009 23:12:09 Sebasti=E1n D. Criado wrote: >> Is 3 =3D 25% or 3 =3D 33,3 %? >=20 > 3 is 33.3% and 4 is 25%. Ok. >=20 >=20 >> What function is in use? >=20 > Not sure that I get your question. Do you mean that: > link quality =3D 100 / $number In http://www.open-mesh.net/browser/trunk/vis/vis.c i saw the following calculation. orig_node->tq_max/(float)neigh->tq_avg for link quality (VIS label). If this is correct, would not be so linear. Am I wrong? Saludos.- --=20 Sebastian.Criado@gmail.com - GPG: 1024D/FB208AA2 797A 6D01 B7FC B8C7 AD5E|counter.li.org: #146768 2A50 66E6 2FFB FB20 8AA2|http://www.lugro.org.ar http://noalamatricula.wordpress.com/about/ read! "Si el Universo fuera un programa estar=EDa hecho en C, y correr=EDa sobre un sistema UNIX" An=F3nimo.