From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <4B740D82.3030101@muc.ccc.de> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:00:34 +0100 From: x@muc.ccc.de MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4B6F288E.8050406@muc.ccc.de> <20100210024321.GB2112@Linus-Debian> <4B7301BC.7080809@muc.ccc.de> <20100211023909.GB6493@Linus-Debian> In-Reply-To: <20100211023909.GB6493@Linus-Debian> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman-adv 0.2 on openwrt Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking hi! Linus Lüssing wrote: > Argh, okay. I guess, you had batman-adv on your laptops already > running and the wifi interfaces up when starting batman-adv on > your laptop, right? possible, i did not check whether bat0/wlan0 was up or down on my laptop (2nd one wasn't running) when i loaded the batman-adv r1568+patch module. so i tried it again, after making sure the laptop (and nothing else) was running batman-adv. but immediately after echo ath1 >/proc/net/batman-adv/interfaces the kernel paniced again. this time, right before the panic, i also got: foo:<6>batman-adv:Adding interface: ath1 foo:<6>batman-adv:Interface activated: ath1 (i didn't remove the foo: when patching, but i did add the ifdef printk undef printk). > If I remember right, then you were saying that you're using the > 8.09.2 release of OpenWRT. Otherwise you could have activated > "Compile the kernel with symbol table information" under "make > menuconfig" --> "Global build settings" to add some function names > to those nice numbers :) i guess this needs a kernel compile, just compiling the module after setting these options will probably not work or not help? i can't compile a kernel for the box because i wasn't able to find the config and possible patches used to build the cambria kernel, so i'm currently kind of stuck with the released 8.09.2 binary kernel... regards, Chris