From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <4C6EB6A8.3030801@linux-migration.net> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:08:56 -0500 From: Jon Roland MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4C6437BF.9080909@web.de> <201008130524.24059.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de> <4C6E2EF6.6000407@bb.banban.jp> <201008201824.22693.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> In-Reply-To: <201008201824.22693.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Where do we stand on working systems? Reply-To: jon.roland@constitution.org, The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org With all this discussion on the technical details of the protocols, I don't see discussion of working or almost-working systems. Clearly, there are working systems, with perhaps a few constraints, such as those of the U.S. military. But if someone wanted to buy the components to set up a system that would work reasonably well most of the time, to whom should she be referred? -- Jon ---------------------------------------------------------- Linux Migration Net http://linux-migration.net 2900 W Anderson Ln C-200-322 Austin, TX 78757 512/299-5001 jroland@linux-migration.net ----------------------------------------------------------