From: Vinay Tharigopula <vinay@orxrail.com>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Subject: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman-adv mesh slows down wired clients (bridge-loop-avoidance)
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:02:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D668F3F.4080700@orxrail.com> (raw)
Hello..
I succesfully configured a batman-adv mesh to add access points to our
existing wired lan. I am using Openwrt 10.04 and batman-adv 2010.1.0.
DHCP and everything works as expected. Any wired or wireless client
connecting to the network gets an IP from a DHCP server hooked into the
switch etc etc.
Our Network configuration:
8 batman-adv routers with a wireless mesh with two or more of the
routers having a wired connection directly to the switch. In this case,
the 8 routers decide to pick one of the "plugged in" routers as a
gateway to avoid bridge loops. This is fine.
I have been running into issues with wired clients however.
When a wired client plugged into the switch tries to contact a wired
client plugged into the same switch, the packets manage to get lost. I
believe they are are going through the wireless routers plugged into the
same switch.
Instead of going like this..
PC 1 ----> switch1 ---> PC 2
they seem to be going like this... (my guess).
PC 1 ---> switch1 ---> wireless router 1 ----(wireless mesh link)---->
wireless router 2 ----> switch1 ---> PC 2.
I think this is because the translation tables on the bat node are
announcing that even the wired clients are connected to them.
This is causing extreme delays even in wired clients. Any help will be
appreciated. Should I enable STP in on the switch ports ?
- Vinay
next reply other threads:[~2011-02-24 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-24 17:02 Vinay Tharigopula [this message]
2011-02-24 19:44 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman-adv mesh slows down wired clients (bridge-loop-avoidance) Linus Lüssing
2011-02-24 20:12 ` Vinay Tharigopula
2011-02-25 0:30 ` Marek Lindner
2011-02-25 13:44 ` Vinay Tharigopula
2011-02-25 16:14 ` Vinay Tharigopula
2011-02-25 16:22 ` Vinay Tharigopula
2011-02-25 22:41 ` Linus Lüssing
2011-02-26 19:31 ` Linus Lüssing
2011-02-26 22:49 ` Marek Lindner
2011-02-28 19:12 ` Vinay Tharigopula
2011-03-01 2:24 ` Marek Lindner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-02-26 23:01 Marek Lindner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D668F3F.4080700@orxrail.com \
--to=vinay@orxrail.com \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox