* [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Software editing of /etc/network/interfaces ?
@ 2011-03-18 17:12 Kevin Steen
2011-03-19 19:54 ` Marek Lindner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Steen @ 2011-03-18 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Anyone know if there are existing script functions to allow a Debian
package to edit/add entries to /etc/network/interfaces ?
I'm trying to create a package which someone can install to get them on
the mesh, rather than a list of instructions on what to edit, etc. The
key thing (AFAIK) is making sure everyone is on the same BSSID and channel.
Anyone created this package for a batman_adv network already?
On a related note, is the on-air format for batman_adv reasonably stable
at the moment? If thousands of FreedomBoxen[1] were to start using it,
what's the likelihood they would all have to upgrade to a new wire
format in the near future?
1. http://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox
Thanks
-Kevin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Software editing of /etc/network/interfaces ?
2011-03-18 17:12 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Software editing of /etc/network/interfaces ? Kevin Steen
@ 2011-03-19 19:54 ` Marek Lindner
2011-03-19 23:53 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Format stable? Kevin Steen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Marek Lindner @ 2011-03-19 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
Hi,
> On a related note, is the on-air format for batman_adv reasonably stable
> at the moment? If thousands of FreedomBoxen[1] were to start using it,
> what's the likelihood they would all have to upgrade to a new wire
> format in the near future?
you might want to define "reasonably stable" for your use case to allow us to
give you an equally reasonable estimate. However, mesh technology is pretty
young and many ideas are flowing around to further improve it. I am sure the
formats will change some day.
Regards,
Marek
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Format stable?
2011-03-19 19:54 ` Marek Lindner
@ 2011-03-19 23:53 ` Kevin Steen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Steen @ 2011-03-19 23:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
On 19/03/11 19:54, Marek Lindner wrote:
>> On a related note, is the on-air format for batman_adv reasonably stable
>> at the moment? If thousands of FreedomBoxen[1] were to start using it,
>> what's the likelihood they would all have to upgrade to a new wire
>> format in the near future?
>
> you might want to define "reasonably stable" for your use case to allow us to
> give you an equally reasonable estimate. However, mesh technology is pretty
> young and many ideas are flowing around to further improve it. I am sure the
> formats will change some day.
:-) Good answer to a poor question!
I think what I should have asked is whether there are any format changes
already planned and defined, just waiting for the code to be signed-off?
I know there will always be unexpected changes to address problems which
get discovered, but as long as there aren't changes already in the
development pipeline, I would call that "reasonably stable".
Since BattleMesh is currently running, and will probably generate many
new ideas, I think I should withdraw my question and ask again in a few
weeks!
-Kevin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-03-19 23:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-03-18 17:12 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Software editing of /etc/network/interfaces ? Kevin Steen
2011-03-19 19:54 ` Marek Lindner
2011-03-19 23:53 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Format stable? Kevin Steen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox