From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <4D854207.3090508@kevinsteen.net> Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 23:53:43 +0000 From: Kevin Steen MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4D839294.9030103@kevinsteen.net> <201103192054.24811.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> In-Reply-To: <201103192054.24811.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Format stable? Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org" On 19/03/11 19:54, Marek Lindner wrote: >> On a related note, is the on-air format for batman_adv reasonably stable >> at the moment? If thousands of FreedomBoxen[1] were to start using it, >> what's the likelihood they would all have to upgrade to a new wire >> format in the near future? > > you might want to define "reasonably stable" for your use case to allow us to > give you an equally reasonable estimate. However, mesh technology is pretty > young and many ideas are flowing around to further improve it. I am sure the > formats will change some day. :-) Good answer to a poor question! I think what I should have asked is whether there are any format changes already planned and defined, just waiting for the code to be signed-off? I know there will always be unexpected changes to address problems which get discovered, but as long as there aren't changes already in the development pipeline, I would call that "reasonably stable". Since BattleMesh is currently running, and will probably generate many new ideas, I think I should withdraw my question and ask again in a few weeks! -Kevin