From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <4E42B783.1040103@virtadpt.net> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:53:23 -0400 From: The Doctor MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87ipr2mjdv.fsf@trurl.pps.jussieu.fr> <4E270F72.10900@virtadpt.net> <7izkk8zsr4.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr> <4E28392B.9020209@virtadpt.net> <7ibown8v2j.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr> <4E403367.4060701@virtadpt.net> <4E411B95.4030203@tnode.com> <4E416584.2020701@virtadpt.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Battlemesh] Battlemesh-like experiment in Washington, DC Reply-To: drwho@virtadpt.net, The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/09/2011 01:40 PM, Glen Duncan wrote: > Doesn't RFC-1918 and supporting protocols check to see if the address > chosen is already in use and back off/retry if it fails? That is an excellent question, but to answer it I will have to do some research and get back to you. - -- The Doctor [412/724/301/703] PGP: 0x807B17C1 / 7960 1CDC 85C9 0B63 8D9F DD89 3BD8 FF2B 807B 17C1 WWW: http://drwho.virtadpt.net/ "And the flowers are still standing!" --Peter Venkman, _Ghostbusters_ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk5Ct4MACgkQO9j/K4B7F8F0sQCghfe67YYb3ESxCrL3myyRB0Ke jKEAoLzkWeyMu1mN4qg975um5XN9Ldoe =qRJY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----