From: fboehm <fboehm@aon.at>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] New batman-advanced logo
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 07:51:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E84077E.80102@aon.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110928194302.GA14192@pandem0nium>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1272 bytes --]
Hey,
attached you find my first try of vectorization and simplification of
the smallfeet-version.
It has very low vector count but perhaps it's already too much different
to the artists concept.
Regards,
Franz
Am 2011-09-28 21:43, schrieb Simon Wunderlich:
> Hey there,
>
> as suggested by Sven, here is the final modification - a little bit
> smaller feet, which should be more aerodynamic. So far, most ppl
> voted against the head separation, so we will skip it.
>
> http://packetmixer.de/batlogo/bat_gimped3_smallfeet.jpg
>
> I'd like to call a final vote between small and big feet. The
> winning version will be our new logo. After all these
> comments and modifications I think we can call it a real
> open source logo ... ;)
>
> Cheers,
> Simon
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 07:31:50PM +0200, Marek Lindner wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> As per Martin Hundebolls suggestion I've added a version with a (visually)
>>> separated head, tell me what you think. :)
>>>
>>> http://packetmixer.de/batlogo/bat_gimped3_headsep.jpg
>> I still prefer the previous version. The separate head requires more attention
>> before the picture becomes clear. At first sight it looks a bit "unusual".
>> IMHO a logo should be "obvious" right from the start.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Marek
>>
[-- Attachment #2: bat_simplified_1.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 16301 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: bat_simplified_1.svg --]
[-- Type: image/svg+xml, Size: 3542 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-29 5:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-27 8:01 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] New batman-advanced logo Simon Wunderlich
2011-09-27 16:37 ` Marek Lindner
2011-09-28 8:21 ` Simon Wunderlich
2011-09-28 8:36 ` Sven Eckelmann
2011-09-28 8:49 ` fboehm
2011-09-28 9:42 ` Simon Wunderlich
2011-09-28 10:00 ` fboehm
2011-09-28 8:38 ` Martin Hundebøll
2011-09-28 8:53 ` Simon Wunderlich
2011-09-28 17:31 ` Marek Lindner
2011-09-28 19:43 ` Simon Wunderlich
2011-09-29 5:51 ` fboehm [this message]
2011-09-29 9:35 ` Sven Eckelmann
2011-09-29 14:35 ` fboehm
2011-10-01 21:47 ` Simon Wunderlich
2011-10-01 22:03 ` Antonio Quartulli
2011-10-02 2:10 ` Marek Lindner
2011-10-02 7:25 ` Gioacchino Mazzurco
2011-10-02 7:47 ` Sven Eckelmann
2011-10-02 10:20 ` Gioacchino Mazzurco
2011-10-02 13:32 ` Simon Wunderlich
2011-10-03 16:19 ` Gioacchino Mazzurco
2011-10-07 23:21 ` Simon Wunderlich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E84077E.80102@aon.at \
--to=fboehm@aon.at \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox