From: "Nicolás Echániz" <nicoechaniz@codigosur.org>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] routing loops on interconnected routers / adhoc + ethernet
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 05:16:15 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F51D34F.9040204@codigosur.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201203031553.53565.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
On 03/03/2012 04:53 AM, Marek Lindner wrote:
> On Saturday, March 03, 2012 15:39:09 Nicolás Echániz wrote:
>> this happens with the nodes configured according to:
>> http://www.open-mesh.org/wiki/batman-adv/Bridge-loop-avoidance
>>
>> or so we understand!
>
> If the ethernet is used for mesh purposes uniquely why do you bother running
> the bridge loop avoidance at all instead of adding the ethernet interface as a
> regular batman interface ? The only reason why you would want the bridge loop
> avoidance is when you have ethernet clients that are bridged into the mesh.
> This does not seem to be the case. As far as I understand the ethernet cable
> is used as reliable "wireless cable".
Maerk thanks for your fast reply. In fact, that's how we started, that's
what I meant by:
"We have also tried adding eth0 to bat0 and take it out of br-lan, which
also "works" but gives routing loops from time to time."
but my english sometimes fails me :)
we also had routing loops with that setup and that's where we started to
look at loop avoidance docs.
I haven't saved traceroutes from that moment; I've actually turned off
the wlan0 on the MR now, but I can turn it back on and add eth0 as a
batman interface to reproduce it.
Is this a known issue or should this not happen in a setup where both
interfaces are added to batman?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-03 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-03 7:39 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] routing loops on interconnected routers / adhoc + ethernet Nicolás Echániz
2012-03-03 7:53 ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-03 8:16 ` Nicolás Echániz [this message]
2012-03-03 8:43 ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-03 10:14 ` Nicolás Echániz
2012-03-03 10:24 ` Nicolás Echániz
2012-03-03 11:32 ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-04 2:30 ` Nicolás Echániz
2012-03-04 8:13 ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-04 9:32 ` Nicolás Echániz
2012-03-04 10:52 ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-18 6:31 ` Nicolás Echániz
2012-03-20 12:51 ` Marek Lindner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F51D34F.9040204@codigosur.org \
--to=nicoechaniz@codigosur.org \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox