public inbox for b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nicolás Echániz" <nicoechaniz@codigosur.org>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
	<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] routing loops on interconnected routers / adhoc + ethernet
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 05:16:15 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F51D34F.9040204@codigosur.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201203031553.53565.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>

On 03/03/2012 04:53 AM, Marek Lindner wrote:
> On Saturday, March 03, 2012 15:39:09 Nicolás Echániz wrote:
>> this happens with the nodes configured according to:
>> http://www.open-mesh.org/wiki/batman-adv/Bridge-loop-avoidance
>>
>> or so we understand!
> 
> If the ethernet is used for mesh purposes uniquely why do you bother running 
> the bridge loop avoidance at all instead of adding the ethernet interface as a 
> regular batman interface ? The only reason why you would want the bridge loop 
> avoidance is when you have ethernet clients that are bridged into the mesh. 
> This does not seem to be the case. As far as I understand the ethernet cable 
> is used as reliable "wireless cable".

Maerk thanks for your fast reply. In fact, that's how we started, that's
what I meant by:

"We have also tried adding eth0 to bat0 and take it out of br-lan, which
also "works" but gives routing loops from time to time."

but my english sometimes fails me :)


we also had routing loops with that setup and that's where we started to
look at loop avoidance docs.


I haven't saved traceroutes from that moment; I've actually turned off
the wlan0 on the MR now, but I can turn it back on and add eth0 as a
batman interface to reproduce it.
Is this a known issue or should this not happen in a setup where both
interfaces are added to batman?





  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-03  8:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-03  7:39 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] routing loops on interconnected routers / adhoc + ethernet Nicolás Echániz
2012-03-03  7:53 ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-03  8:16   ` Nicolás Echániz [this message]
2012-03-03  8:43     ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-03 10:14       ` Nicolás Echániz
2012-03-03 10:24         ` Nicolás Echániz
2012-03-03 11:32           ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-04  2:30             ` Nicolás Echániz
2012-03-04  8:13               ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-04  9:32                 ` Nicolás Echániz
2012-03-04 10:52                   ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-18  6:31                     ` Nicolás Echániz
2012-03-20 12:51                       ` Marek Lindner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F51D34F.9040204@codigosur.org \
    --to=nicoechaniz@codigosur.org \
    --cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox