From: Matthias Schiffer <mschiffer@universe-factory.net>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCHv2] batman-adv: fix visualization output without neighbors on the primary interface
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 06:35:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FA75113.40401@universe-factory.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120506201435.GA27416@pandem0nium>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1522 bytes --]
On 05/06/2012 10:14 PM, Simon Wunderlich wrote:
> Your patch does the trick, although I think this ugly function could use a rewrite.
> First counting bytes and then allocating this size to do exactly the same thing again
> is not really good style. If you would like to volunteer to do this job (or plan to
> work more on vis), please tell me, otherwise I'll put it in on my TODO list.
While I'am already at it, I guess I can also volunteer to do some more vis work :)
Besides cleanup, are there more ideas about the vis? A nice feature I can think about would be adding some freely chosen identification string (for example the hostname) to the vis data, this could make big graphs much more readable. I wonder though if this would be possible without breaking compatiblity.
I have some questions about the code though:
- Is there any reason vis_seq_print_text() allocates a buffer at all instead of just printing the data directy into the seq_file? Looking at the seq_printf implementation, there doesn't seem to be a problem calling it while holding the lock.
- In many places in the vis code hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() is used to iterate over the hash lists, even though all access to vis_hash is guarded by the vis_hash_lock, so it seems to be okay to just use hlist_for_each_entry(). In some functions, vis_seq_print_text() being one of them, rcu_read_lock/unlock pairs could be removed as well with this change. Do I overlook something?
I'll also drop by the batman IRC channel.
Matthias
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-07 4:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-05 15:05 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: fix visualization output without neighbors on the primary interface Matthias Schiffer
2012-05-05 15:29 ` Sven Eckelmann
2012-05-05 15:49 ` Matthias Schiffer
2012-05-05 15:51 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCHv2] " Matthias Schiffer
2012-05-06 20:14 ` Simon Wunderlich
2012-05-07 4:35 ` Matthias Schiffer [this message]
2012-05-07 6:40 ` Marek Lindner
2012-05-07 11:10 ` Matthias Schiffer
2012-05-07 11:28 ` Sven Eckelmann
2012-05-08 6:04 ` Marek Lindner
2012-05-08 12:51 ` Matthias Schiffer
2012-05-08 20:52 ` Guido Iribarren
2012-05-09 11:33 ` Marek Lindner
2012-05-09 16:10 ` Martin Hundebøll
2012-05-10 19:47 ` Matthias Schiffer
2012-05-10 20:19 ` Marek Lindner
2012-05-10 20:46 ` Matthias Schiffer
2012-05-07 6:43 ` Sven Eckelmann
2012-05-07 6:43 ` Marek Lindner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FA75113.40401@universe-factory.net \
--to=mschiffer@universe-factory.net \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox