From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <50779CA3.9070208@yahoo.de> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 12:29:23 +0800 From: Marek Lindner MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <507798EE.80305@codigosur.org> In-Reply-To: <507798EE.80305@codigosur.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman-adv: ap mode with isolation enabled Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking On 10/12/2012 12:13 PM, Nicol=E1s Ech=E1niz wrote: > Here's a blog post on this matter with related graphics: > http://blog.altermundi.net/article/batman-adv-ap-mode-with-isolation-enab= led/ > > Summary: > Infrastrucutre nodes tend to "confuse" batman-adv. Every client > connected to an ap will =93think=94 that it is directly connected to every > other client, which creates a mess in potential hops selection. Guess you have to better explain your setup if you want others to=20 understand. The phrase "the networks uses mixed adhoc and infrastructure=20 modes" is not self-explanatory. Cheers, Marek