From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <50EC4AC5.60103@altermundi.net> Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 13:35:17 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?NicoEch=E1niz?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4FD8BE79-700F-402E-AC8B-ACA10D6DD61C@stephan.homeunix.net> <201301081415.31205.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> In-Reply-To: <201301081415.31205.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Unterstanding gateway-mode - why do nodes have a "sticky" gateway Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking On 01/08/2013 03:15 AM, Marek Lindner wrote: > May I propose that we schedule an IRC discussion for this topic ? I lost track > of what you are actually trying to achieve and I see things getting more and > more complicated. > Whatever idea you come up with keep in mind that somebody has to do the > following before this solution can be merged: > > * batman-adv code has to be written, tested & debugged > * batman-adv kernel doc has to be written > * batctl code has to be written, tested & debugged > * man page has to be updated > * user documentation for $your_new_mechanism has to be written > > Unless you manage to convince somebody else to do the work for you that > somebody who has to do all work will be you. In other words: It is in your > best interest to keep things as simple as possible. :-) agreed. When would it be a good time for an IRC discussion on this matter?