From: Gui Iribarren <gui@altermundi.net>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Subject: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Multiple border gateways between bat-networks
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 21:55:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5148D0CB.3090907@altermundi.net> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2239 bytes --]
Hey folks!
today we bring you a riddle to start the week
/me grins...
First, some clues:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.freifunk.batman/6603
http://www.open-mesh.org/projects/open-mesh/wiki/FAQ#How-do-I-announce-IP-subnets-using-batman-adv
now, given the attached diagram .png
* the description given in the wiki still applies, i.e. A, B, C...
nodes run your favourite layer3 dynamic routing protocol, and all nodes
run batman, in segmented (colored) clouds = subnets.
* i am one of the clients connected to F
* in the blue cloud, there's one preferred gw_mode=server which is D
(or E for that matter, but certainly not F or G)
* D gave me a DHCP OFFER and since then is my default gw, which i use
to access the internet. I have no other routes setup.
* the violet link G <-> H although it looks "long" is in fact a superb
link, 0% packet loss, high bw. F <-> G also works great.
Now, i want to send a file to H. Visibly, the optimal route would be F
-> G -> H.
BUT, i only have a default gw, which is D. I pass the packet to D.
Thanks to the layer3 routing protocol, D knows that both E and G have
access to the red network. However, E is closer so it relays the packet
there, and at the same time ICMP-REDIRECTs me saying "hey, in order to
get to the red network, you don't need to send packets to me; save
yourself a hop and use E directly"
Great, so now i get a new temporary routing entry which is sub-optimal,
since my traffic will go all over 5 hops, instead of taking the optimal
F-G-H
Now the catchy question: Is there any way for my traffic to find the
optimal path, in this scenario?
Spoiler: I get the feeling the answer is "no", since D is giving me the
optimal path *according to D perspective*, and there's no way to for D
to understand my perspective.
So... it seems to me that, even with this mix of layer2 and 3 described
in the wiki, the solution cannot currently handle traffic in the most
optimal way, inside networks that have more than one border gateway with
another network.
But asking never hurts!
Bonus question: If my reasoning is correct, and my conclusion is sadly
true... are there any plans to address this issue (/corner case?), and how?
Have a nice week!
Gui
[-- Attachment #2: quagga_integration_problem.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 105091 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2013-03-19 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-19 20:55 Gui Iribarren [this message]
2013-03-20 11:35 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Multiple border gateways between bat-networks Andrew Lunn
2013-03-20 13:44 ` NicoEchániz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5148D0CB.3090907@altermundi.net \
--to=gui@altermundi.net \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox