From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <51AF567A.7030404@inti.gob.ar> Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 12:17:14 -0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?R2FicmllbCBUb2zDs24=?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <51A3C7E9.7080208@inti.gob.ar> <20130528070057.GC3333@ritirata.org> <51ACBCE4.8000506@inti.gob.ar> <20130603160813.GC1226@ritirata.org> <51AD0277.1060907@inti.gob.ar> <20130604051326.GJ1226@ritirata.org> <20130604053841.GK1226@ritirata.org> In-Reply-To: <20130604053841.GK1226@ritirata.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batctl bw performance Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Antonio Quartulli Cc: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Hi, Now I'm with batman-adv 5ffa8f201d085764365d202ace14675032cc3a74, batctl 6d3d4d1f80dca31b6400f3794772016cdbc19a73, and openwrt r36826. The results are almost the same, no batctl pings, and batctl bw much slower than iperfs. wdr3500 have 2 radios, these are the routes: El 04/06/13 02:38, Antonio Quartulli escribió: > On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 07:13:26AM +0200, Antonio Quartulli wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 05:54:15PM -0300, Gabriel Tolón wrote: >>> So, in menuconfig I should select that id for batman-adv-devel right? I >>> wanted to see that commit on the git page using the search field but I >>> couldn't. By the way, how to know which batctl version use with each >>> batman-adv-devel commit? Sorry if all these questions are too basic, but >>> I've tried to compile with this d672369 version and I got some errors, >>> so I'd like to understand if it was related to these things. >> >> no problems. These are not basic questions :) Actually the user usually do not >> enter these dev details and therefore it is normal to find issues. >> >> For batctl, you should use the last commit ID in this branch (ordex/bw_meter) >> http://git.open-mesh.org/batctl.git/shortlog/refs/heads/ordex/bw_meter >> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> By the way, your iperf tests have been done on top of batman-adv? or directly on >>>> the wifi interface? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>> >>> I got the results mentioned using interfaces managed by batman-adv. >> >> mh...maybe the pign is not working because of some changes brought by the >> bw_meter in the icmp packets. I'll check and I'll let you know. > > I juested the current ordex/bw_meter branches (batctl and batman-adv) and the > ping works fine. > > Please, let me know your results. > > Cheers, > >