From: "Gabriel Tolón" <gtolon@inti.gob.ar>
To: Antonio Quartulli <ordex@autistici.org>
Cc: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batctl bw performance
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 12:27:48 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51AF58F4.8080501@inti.gob.ar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51AF567A.7030404@inti.gob.ar>
Sorry, I sent the mail incomplete,
So these are the routes:
Equipo1:
root@Equipo 1:~# batctl o
[B.A.T.M.A.N. adv 5ffa8f2, MainIF/MAC: wlan0-1/66:70:02:4e:d9:42 (bat0)]
Originator last-seen (#/255) Nexthop [outgoingIF]:
Potential nexthops ...
E3-5GHz 0.680s (251) E3-5GHz [ wlan1-1]:
E3-5GHz (251)
E3-2GHz 0.430s (255) E3-5GHz [ wlan1-1]:
E3-5GHz (255) E3-2GHz (252)
Equipo3:
root@Equipo 3:~# batctl o
[B.A.T.M.A.N. adv 5ffa8f2, MainIF/MAC: wlan0-1/66:70:02:4e:d9:d6 (bat0)]
Originator last-seen (#/255) Nexthop [outgoingIF]:
Potential nexthops ...
E1-2GHz 0.310s (255) E1-5GHz [ wlan1-1]:
E1-5GHz (255) E1-2GHz (255)
E1-5GHz 0.550s (255) E1-5GHz [ wlan1-1]:
E1-5GHz (255)
The results of batctl pings:
Equipo1:
root@Equipo 1:~# batctl ping E3-2GHz
PING E3-2GHz (66:70:02:4e:d9:d6) 20(48) bytes of data
Reply from host E3-2GHz timed out
Reply from host E3-2GHz timed out
root@Equipo 1:~# batctl ping E3-5GHz
PING E3-5GHz (66:70:02:4e:d9:d7) 20(48) bytes of data
Reply from host E3-5GHz timed out
Reply from host E3-5GHz timed out
Equipo3:
root@Equipo 3:~# batctl ping E1-2GHz
PING E1-2GHz (66:70:02:4e:d9:42) 20(48) bytes of data
Reply from host E1-2GHz timed out
Reply from host E1-2GHz timed out
root@Equipo 3:~# batctl ping E1-5GHz
PING E1-5GHz (66:70:02:4e:d9:43) 20(48) bytes of data
Reply from host E1-5GHz timed out
Reply from host E1-5GHz timed out
If there is more info I could send you just tell me.
Regards
Gabriel
El 05/06/13 12:17, Gabriel Tolón escribió:
> Hi,
>
> Now I'm with batman-adv 5ffa8f201d085764365d202ace14675032cc3a74, batctl
> 6d3d4d1f80dca31b6400f3794772016cdbc19a73, and openwrt r36826.
>
> The results are almost the same, no batctl pings, and batctl bw much
> slower than iperfs. wdr3500 have 2 radios, these are the routes:
>
>
>
>
>
> El 04/06/13 02:38, Antonio Quartulli escribió:
>> On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 07:13:26AM +0200, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 05:54:15PM -0300, Gabriel Tolón wrote:
>>>> So, in menuconfig I should select that id for batman-adv-devel right? I
>>>> wanted to see that commit on the git page using the search field but I
>>>> couldn't. By the way, how to know which batctl version use with each
>>>> batman-adv-devel commit? Sorry if all these questions are too basic,
>>>> but
>>>> I've tried to compile with this d672369 version and I got some errors,
>>>> so I'd like to understand if it was related to these things.
>>>
>>> no problems. These are not basic questions :) Actually the user
>>> usually do not
>>> enter these dev details and therefore it is normal to find issues.
>>>
>>> For batctl, you should use the last commit ID in this branch
>>> (ordex/bw_meter)
>>> http://git.open-mesh.org/batctl.git/shortlog/refs/heads/ordex/bw_meter
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> By the way, your iperf tests have been done on top of batman-adv?
>>>>> or directly on
>>>>> the wifi interface?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I got the results mentioned using interfaces managed by batman-adv.
>>>
>>> mh...maybe the pign is not working because of some changes brought by
>>> the
>>> bw_meter in the icmp packets. I'll check and I'll let you know.
>>
>> I juested the current ordex/bw_meter branches (batctl and batman-adv)
>> and the
>> ping works fine.
>>
>> Please, let me know your results.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-05 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <51A3C7E9.7080208@inti.gob.ar>
[not found] ` <20130528070057.GC3333@ritirata.org>
[not found] ` <51ACBCE4.8000506@inti.gob.ar>
2013-06-03 16:08 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batctl bw performance Antonio Quartulli
2013-06-03 20:54 ` Gabriel Tolón
2013-06-04 5:13 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-06-04 5:38 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-06-05 15:17 ` Gabriel Tolón
2013-06-05 15:27 ` Gabriel Tolón [this message]
2013-06-06 5:51 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-06-06 18:19 ` Gabriel Tolón
2013-06-06 18:29 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-06-06 19:04 ` Gabriel Tolón
2013-06-06 19:18 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-06-07 13:49 ` Gabriel Tolón
2013-06-07 13:57 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-06-07 14:38 ` Gabriel Tolón
2013-06-07 14:40 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-06-07 17:13 ` Gabriel Tolón
2013-06-07 17:27 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-06-07 18:39 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-06-07 18:57 ` Gabriel Tolón
2013-06-08 12:29 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-06-08 20:20 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-06-09 0:26 ` NicoEchániz
2013-06-10 13:12 ` Gabriel Tolón
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51AF58F4.8080501@inti.gob.ar \
--to=gtolon@inti.gob.ar \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
--cc=ordex@autistici.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox