From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <51AF58F4.8080501@inti.gob.ar> Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 12:27:48 -0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?R2FicmllbCBUb2zDs24=?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <51A3C7E9.7080208@inti.gob.ar> <20130528070057.GC3333@ritirata.org> <51ACBCE4.8000506@inti.gob.ar> <20130603160813.GC1226@ritirata.org> <51AD0277.1060907@inti.gob.ar> <20130604051326.GJ1226@ritirata.org> <20130604053841.GK1226@ritirata.org> <51AF567A.7030404@inti.gob.ar> In-Reply-To: <51AF567A.7030404@inti.gob.ar> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batctl bw performance Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Antonio Quartulli Cc: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Sorry, I sent the mail incomplete, So these are the routes: Equipo1: root@Equipo 1:~# batctl o [B.A.T.M.A.N. adv 5ffa8f2, MainIF/MAC: wlan0-1/66:70:02:4e:d9:42 (bat0)] Originator last-seen (#/255) Nexthop [outgoingIF]: Potential nexthops ... E3-5GHz 0.680s (251) E3-5GHz [ wlan1-1]: E3-5GHz (251) E3-2GHz 0.430s (255) E3-5GHz [ wlan1-1]: E3-5GHz (255) E3-2GHz (252) Equipo3: root@Equipo 3:~# batctl o [B.A.T.M.A.N. adv 5ffa8f2, MainIF/MAC: wlan0-1/66:70:02:4e:d9:d6 (bat0)] Originator last-seen (#/255) Nexthop [outgoingIF]: Potential nexthops ... E1-2GHz 0.310s (255) E1-5GHz [ wlan1-1]: E1-5GHz (255) E1-2GHz (255) E1-5GHz 0.550s (255) E1-5GHz [ wlan1-1]: E1-5GHz (255) The results of batctl pings: Equipo1: root@Equipo 1:~# batctl ping E3-2GHz PING E3-2GHz (66:70:02:4e:d9:d6) 20(48) bytes of data Reply from host E3-2GHz timed out Reply from host E3-2GHz timed out root@Equipo 1:~# batctl ping E3-5GHz PING E3-5GHz (66:70:02:4e:d9:d7) 20(48) bytes of data Reply from host E3-5GHz timed out Reply from host E3-5GHz timed out Equipo3: root@Equipo 3:~# batctl ping E1-2GHz PING E1-2GHz (66:70:02:4e:d9:42) 20(48) bytes of data Reply from host E1-2GHz timed out Reply from host E1-2GHz timed out root@Equipo 3:~# batctl ping E1-5GHz PING E1-5GHz (66:70:02:4e:d9:43) 20(48) bytes of data Reply from host E1-5GHz timed out Reply from host E1-5GHz timed out If there is more info I could send you just tell me. Regards Gabriel El 05/06/13 12:17, Gabriel Tolón escribió: > Hi, > > Now I'm with batman-adv 5ffa8f201d085764365d202ace14675032cc3a74, batctl > 6d3d4d1f80dca31b6400f3794772016cdbc19a73, and openwrt r36826. > > The results are almost the same, no batctl pings, and batctl bw much > slower than iperfs. wdr3500 have 2 radios, these are the routes: > > > > > > El 04/06/13 02:38, Antonio Quartulli escribió: >> On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 07:13:26AM +0200, Antonio Quartulli wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 05:54:15PM -0300, Gabriel Tolón wrote: >>>> So, in menuconfig I should select that id for batman-adv-devel right? I >>>> wanted to see that commit on the git page using the search field but I >>>> couldn't. By the way, how to know which batctl version use with each >>>> batman-adv-devel commit? Sorry if all these questions are too basic, >>>> but >>>> I've tried to compile with this d672369 version and I got some errors, >>>> so I'd like to understand if it was related to these things. >>> >>> no problems. These are not basic questions :) Actually the user >>> usually do not >>> enter these dev details and therefore it is normal to find issues. >>> >>> For batctl, you should use the last commit ID in this branch >>> (ordex/bw_meter) >>> http://git.open-mesh.org/batctl.git/shortlog/refs/heads/ordex/bw_meter >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> By the way, your iperf tests have been done on top of batman-adv? >>>>> or directly on >>>>> the wifi interface? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>> >>>> I got the results mentioned using interfaces managed by batman-adv. >>> >>> mh...maybe the pign is not working because of some changes brought by >>> the >>> bw_meter in the icmp packets. I'll check and I'll let you know. >> >> I juested the current ordex/bw_meter branches (batctl and batman-adv) >> and the >> ping works fine. >> >> Please, let me know your results. >> >> Cheers, >> >>