From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <51B1E4D6.5000900@inti.gob.ar> Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 10:49:10 -0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?R2FicmllbCBUb2zDs24=?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20130603160813.GC1226@ritirata.org> <51AD0277.1060907@inti.gob.ar> <20130604051326.GJ1226@ritirata.org> <20130604053841.GK1226@ritirata.org> <51AF567A.7030404@inti.gob.ar> <51AF58F4.8080501@inti.gob.ar> <20130606055102.GH1789@ritirata.org> <51B0D294.4070809@inti.gob.ar> <20130606182954.GI1789@ritirata.org> <51B0DD43.6090500@inti.gob.ar> <20130606191823.GJ1789@ritirata.org> In-Reply-To: <20130606191823.GJ1789@ritirata.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batctl bw performance Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Antonio Quartulli Cc: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking El 06/06/13 16:18, Antonio Quartulli escribió: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 04:04:35PM -0300, Gabriel Tolón wrote: >> El 06/06/13 15:29, Antonio Quartulli escribió: >>> On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 03:19:00PM -0300, Gabriel Tolón wrote: >>>> Hi Antonio, >>>> >>>> >>>> El 06/06/13 02:51, Antonio Quartulli escribió: >>>>> Hello Gabriel, >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 12:27:48PM -0300, Gabriel Tolón wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry, I sent the mail incomplete, >>>>>> >>>>>> So these are the routes: >>>>>> >>>>>> Equipo1: >>>>>> >>>>>> root@Equipo 1:~# batctl o >>>>>> [B.A.T.M.A.N. adv 5ffa8f2, MainIF/MAC: wlan0-1/66:70:02:4e:d9:42 (bat0)] >>>>>> Originator last-seen (#/255) Nexthop [outgoingIF]: >>>>>> Potential nexthops ... >>>>>> E3-5GHz 0.680s (251) E3-5GHz [ wlan1-1]: >>>>>> E3-5GHz (251) >>>>>> E3-2GHz 0.430s (255) E3-5GHz [ wlan1-1]: >>>>>> E3-5GHz (255) E3-2GHz (252) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Equipo3: >>>>>> >>>>>> root@Equipo 3:~# batctl o >>>>>> [B.A.T.M.A.N. adv 5ffa8f2, MainIF/MAC: wlan0-1/66:70:02:4e:d9:d6 (bat0)] >>>>>> Originator last-seen (#/255) Nexthop [outgoingIF]: >>>>>> Potential nexthops ... >>>>>> E1-2GHz 0.310s (255) E1-5GHz [ wlan1-1]: >>>>>> E1-5GHz (255) E1-2GHz (255) >>>>>> E1-5GHz 0.550s (255) E1-5GHz [ wlan1-1]: >>>>>> E1-5GHz (255) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> routing tables look good. I am wondering where the problem can be.. >>>>> Can you try to do a "batctl td wlan0-1" while pinging? this may help to >>>>> understand where the process is blocking. >>>>> It would be helpful if you could do that on both the nodes while pinging in only >>>>> one direction This way we see who receives what. >>>> >>>> I did it, but the text files for the logs of the nodes with "batctl td" >>>> have a size of about 250 kB each one, with just 1 or 2 seconds logging. >>>> Is that too much for sending them to the list? >>> >>> maybe you can upload them somewhere and then send the link here? >>> >> >> Yes, should be here: >> >> http://pastebin.com/GNSC2Pmn >> >> http://pastebin.com/m3xtjchX >> >> >> the batctl ping was from E1 to E3. > > Hello Gabriel, > there is a lot of noise because you are also generating traffic on the network. > However I can see the ICMP Echo Request and then an Echo Reply, therefore the > two nodes seem to be exchanging ICMP packets correctly. > > I'm checking again to try to understand what went wrong. > > Meanwhile, can you please report the output of > "batctl l" > during a bw test after having set the bw_meter log level by running > "batctl ll bwm" ? > > To get the exact log of one test, you can first run batctl l (this will print > all the past log), then you run the test and then you run batctl l again to > obtain the interesting log. Please upload it on pastebin too. > > Thanks a lot! > Sure, here they are: http://pastebin.com/fLu9hsyt http://pastebin.com/tjdiu3Tk