From: cmsv <cmsv@wirelesspt.net>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Complete netifd integration in openwrt
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 20:39:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F5B9AF.9020909@wirelesspt.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51F5B134.4030203@altermundi.net>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2714 bytes --]
Is this change going to be in efect with current openwrt AA and
batman-adv 2013.3.0 or still optional ?
On 07/28/2013 08:03 PM, Gui Iribarren wrote:
> Hello folks,
> i finally took the time to finish the netifd integration in openwrt.
> since 2013.0.0, the "slave interfaces" moved from
> batman-adv.bat0.interfaces to network.meshblah.proto=batadv, so that
> netifd could properly manage the setup and teardown, avoiding some race
> conditions i faced at that time (about a year ago)
> now i did the same for the "mesh interface", batX, which until now had
> the parameters still set in /etc/config/batman-adv.
>
> ### So, what in 2012.4.0 was
>
> # cat /etc/config/batman-adv
> config 'mesh' 'bat0'
> option 'interfaces' 'mesh0'
> option 'ap_isolation' '1'
> option 'gw_mode' 'server'
>
> # cat /etc/config/network
> config interface 'mesh0'
> option ifname 'eth2'
> option proto 'none'
> option auto '1'
>
> ### now fully turns into:
Now as for batman-adv 2013.3.0 already in effect?
>
> # cat /etc/config/network
> config interface 'bat0'
> option proto 'batmesh'
> option ifname 'bat0'
> option ap_isolation '1'
> option gw_mode 'server'
>
> config interface 'mesh0'
> option ifname 'eth2'
> option proto 'batadv'
> option mesh 'bat0'
also valid for all previous /etc/config/batman-adv available options or
just the ones you wrote here?
>
> [about the proto name... since proto=batadv was already taken for slave
> interfaces, i couldn't come up with anything better than "batmesh" :(
> I was talking with Nico just now, and he suggested "batadvmesh"
> in any case, suggestions are much welcome. Anyway, proto=bat.*mesh is
> for setting the mesh parameters]
>
> and well, to avoid breaking current configs unnecesarily [over
> sysupgrades (or opkg upgrades?)] i included a small uci-defaults
> migration script to take care of that; it transparently migrates all
> current /etc/config/batman-adv settings to netifd-style.
>
> Why the integration? reliability in the setup; no more race conditions
> whatsoever at boot, or runtime: i even tried rmmoding the module, and
> doing "ifup mesh0" brought everything up again cleanly. while netifd had
> some stigmas when it was born, now (in my experience) it has grown to a
> pretty solid nifty daemon.
>
> I made a pull request on
> https://github.com/openwrt-routing/packages/pull/4
> comments welcome :D
if accepted will it be patched in 2013.3.0 or added to the next release?
>
> if you prefer [PATCHES] over mail, just ask :)
>
> as always, cheers, and thanks for being so cool people!
>
> Gui
>
[-- Attachment #1.2: 0x782BF73E.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 36799 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 901 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-29 0:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-29 0:03 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Complete netifd integration in openwrt Gui Iribarren
2013-07-29 0:39 ` cmsv [this message]
2013-07-29 1:18 ` Gui Iribarren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51F5B9AF.9020909@wirelesspt.net \
--to=cmsv@wirelesspt.net \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox