From: Fernando Pizarro <feanpg@gmail.com>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Originators with cero TQ
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:37:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52655830.8080607@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131021131745.GB1544@neomailbox.net>
El 21/10/13 15:17, Antonio Quartulli escribió:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 01:23:37PM +0100, Bruno Alexandre Taraio dos Santos Antunes wrote:
>> I think its spanish for zero
> In that case..If I remember correctly you can have TQ=0 only for "Potential
> Netxthops". If an originator has a TQ=0 on the best path then it is should not
> be shown in the originator table.
>
> However, if you have further doubts, please post the table.
>
> Regards,
>
Hi all,
That's correct. Nodes with cero value (TQ=0) there are in "Potential
Nexthops" but there are a lot of them in the originator table. In some
cases, only there is one node with TQ major than 0. Example:
172.16.0.9 0.300s (196) 172.16.0.36 [ wlan1]: 172.16.0.40
( 0) 172.16.0.35 ( 0) 172.16.0.22 ( 0) 172.16.0.39
( 0) 172.16.0.33 ( 0) 172.16.0.32 ( 0) 172.16.0.36
(196)
Full table in this link: hxxp://pastebin.com/6rpieA7y
There are another cases, a behaviour that I don't understand is this:
Traffic is being routed using a SINGLE jump (or direct link) very low
bandwidth to its target, but there are many other options with better
bandwidth, however using more jumps/links, why is this happening and how
can I control it?
Number of hop are more important than link quality to calculate TQ
value? Is there any "well-known formula" to calculate TQ?
I make some tests changing default class of a client to 3 (batctl gw
client 3) with same results. What is the best client value for a large
enviroment (about 40 AP's)?
Thanks for all.
Regards, Fernando.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-21 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-21 12:05 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Originators with cero TQ Fernando Pizarro
2013-10-21 12:21 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-21 12:23 ` Bruno Alexandre Taraio dos Santos Antunes
2013-10-21 13:17 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-21 16:37 ` Fernando Pizarro [this message]
2013-10-22 6:28 ` Antonio Quartulli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52655830.8080607@gmail.com \
--to=feanpg@gmail.com \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox