From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <527E152F.5090708@wirelesspt.net> Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 05:57:51 -0500 From: cmsv MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Replacing OLSRD with batman-adv? Reply-To: cmsv@wirelesspt.net, The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Hello Travis. On 11/08/2013 03:42 AM, tjhowse wrote: > Hi Ladies and Gents, > > I've built a three-node mesh network using cheap TP-Link TL-WDR3600 > routers. They can do simultaneous 5.8GHz and 2.4GHz. I use the 5.8 for > the backbone links between the nodes, and 2.4 to clients. The nodes > are running OpenWRT and OLSRD. > > This system mostly works well, but there are a couple of problems with > it that I'm wondering if batman-adv would solve or make easier to > solve: > > 1) The backbone links cannot be better protected than WEP, a > limitation of OLSRD, > 2) Gateway assignment is a manual process, which must be performed on > every node in the mesh, referring to the single node connected to the > WAN, > 3) The manual gateway configuration of 2) prevents peer-to-peer > communications between mesh clients, > 4) Each node has its own /24 subnet. This causes problems when a > device roams from one device's jurisdiction to another if the > interface doesn't re-issue a DHCP request. > > We're expanding the network, I've just bought another ten of these > routers, and I'm going to spend some time assessing if batman-adv > would be a better fit for our purposes. There will be a range of ios, > android and windows devices connecting to the mesh. > > My questions are as follows: > > 1) Does batman-adv worth with WPA2 or better encryption? Yes but you need some changes such as replacing wpad-mini by wpad and probably mac80211 and hostpad depending on which openwrt release you will be using to do all this. > 2) Must every client to a batman-adv mesh have a daemon installed? Every node must have batman-adv > 3) Is it possible to separate different radio interfaces for different > purposes? I.E. 5.8 for backbone, 2.4 for clients. Yes and you can even have VAP's > 4) Can all nodes and clients on a mesh have an IP in the same subnet, > solving some of the roaming problems caused by bad interface settings > or drivers? Yes. Let me know about your progress regarding these changes if you encounter some issues because there are some and i have also being trying to solve them. > > Thanks, > Travis. > . >