From: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@meshcoding.com>
To: cmsv@wirelesspt.net
Cc: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman-adv 2014.0.0 released
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 07:46:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52DF6939.4080909@meshcoding.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52DF166A.7080309@wirelesspt.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3928 bytes --]
On 22/01/14 01:52, cmsv wrote:
> inline:
>
> On 01/21/2014 07:31 PM, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
>> On 22/01/14 01:29, cmsv wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/21/2014 07:20 PM, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
>>>> On 22/01/14 01:14, cmsv wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 01/21/2014 07:06 PM, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
>>>>>> On 22/01/14 01:00, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
>>>>>>> On 21/01/14 21:01, cmsv wrote:
>>>>>>>> Yes i understand that but it keeps on increasing.
>>>>>>>> [ 28.600000] batman_adv: bat0: The MTU of interface adhoc0 is too
>>>>>>>> small (1546) to handle the transport of batman-adv packets. Packets
>>>>>>>> going over this interface will be fragmented on layer2 which could
>>>>>>>> impact the performance. Setting the MTU to 1560 would solve the problem.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Have you tried applying this patch before testing it once again?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://git.open-mesh.org/batman-adv.git/commit/746d6436f88899a79c1cb3b27af0614510368bb7
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually this patch is already part of the batman-adv package in openwrt.
>>>>>> Therefore the question turns in: did you update the batman-adv package
>>>>>> before performing your second test?
>>>>>
>>>>> the second test was done today and yesterday's i updated bataman-adv.
>>>>
>>>> Yes but we are creating confusion.
>>> Maybe. Lets see.
>>>>
>>>> In the second test you *enabled* network coding, therefore it is normal
>>>> that the overhead grew up. This happens because NC uses more bytes for
>>>> its header.
>>>
>>>
>>> In both tests NC was enabled. I have NC enabled by default before and
>>> after the update.
>>> In fact is all tests NC is enabled by default and i undestand the
>>> increase to 1546 but to 1560 it surprised me.
>>> Should i still see the increase to 1560 or should it stayed at 1546
>>> which would be 1532 ?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> [Please don't remove the batman-adv mailing list from the CC field.]
>>
> unintentional mistake of too many buttons around :P
>
>>
>> The first test you have performed was without the patch that fixes the
>> value reported in that message.
>>
>>
>>
>> Now that the patch is applied you have to see 1560 when NC is enabled
>> and 1532 when it is disabled.
>
> Doing some tests and with NC disabled:
>
> uci show batman-adv | grep network_coding
> batman-adv.bat0.network_coding=0
>
> after reboot:
>
> # dmesg | grep MTU
> [ 28.030000] batman_adv: bat0: The MTU of interface adhoc0 is too
> small (1546) to handle the transport of batman-adv packets. Packets
> going over this interface will be fragmented on layer2 which could
> impact the performance. Setting the MTU to 1560 would solve the problem.
>
> uci show network | grep mtu
> network.mesh0.mtu=1546
>
> changing the mtu to 1560 when NC is disabled:
>
> # uci show batman-adv | grep network_coding
> batman-adv.bat0.network_coding=0
>
> # dmesg | grep MTU
> no output/result
>
> # ifconfig | grep MTU
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1560 Metric:1
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1440 Metric:1
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1440 Metric:1
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>
> Frist result if the adhoc interface with 1560
>
> correct me if i am mistaken but according to you it should be 1532 ?
>
> Changing it to 1532 still keeping network coding disabled.
>
> uci set network.mesh0.mtu=1532
> uci commit network
> reboot
>
> uci show network| grep mtu
> network.mesh0.mtu=1532
>
> uci show batman-adv | grep network_coding
> batman-adv.bat0.network_coding=0
No, the MTU value changes only when NC is disabled at compile time.
--
Antonio Quartulli
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-22 6:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-07 12:53 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman-adv 2014.0.0 released Marek Lindner
2014-01-14 22:04 ` cmsv
2014-01-15 7:00 ` Martin Hundebøll
2014-01-15 11:13 ` cmsv
2014-01-15 11:15 ` Antonio Quartulli
2014-01-21 20:01 ` cmsv
2014-01-22 0:00 ` Antonio Quartulli
2014-01-22 0:06 ` Antonio Quartulli
[not found] ` <52DF0D4E.5070207@wirelesspt.net>
2014-01-22 0:20 ` Antonio Quartulli
[not found] ` <52DF10D1.4080207@wirelesspt.net>
2014-01-22 0:31 ` Antonio Quartulli
2014-01-22 0:52 ` cmsv
2014-01-22 6:46 ` Antonio Quartulli [this message]
2014-01-22 6:50 ` Martin Hundebøll
2014-02-10 19:45 ` cmsv
2014-02-10 19:57 ` Antonio Quartulli
2014-02-10 21:49 ` Linus Lüssing
2014-02-11 3:22 ` Marek Lindner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52DF6939.4080909@meshcoding.com \
--to=antonio@meshcoding.com \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
--cc=cmsv@wirelesspt.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox