From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <52E51A04.8020800@meshcoding.com> Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 15:21:56 +0100 From: Antonio Quartulli MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1390299725-1873-1-git-send-email-antonio@meshcoding.com> <86mwipch0u.fsf@coulee.tdb.com> <86lhy8pn5v.fsf@coulee.tdb.com> <52DF7556.9090200@makrotopia.org> <86y527oqpl.fsf_-_@coulee.tdb.com> <52E003DD.6040302@meshcoding.com> <52E02EDC.3080805@wirelesspt.net> <86iotbo9hw.fsf@coulee.tdb.com> <52E05E0F.7010203@wirelesspt.net> <52E08DFE.9030604@makrotopia.org> <52E5063E.3080408@makrotopia.org> In-Reply-To: <52E5063E.3080408@makrotopia.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hDWWdIfsMOUNd8skBmKNC3eB6GBkFMJui" Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman-adv: memory leak? Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --hDWWdIfsMOUNd8skBmKNC3eB6GBkFMJui Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 26/01/14 13:57, Daniel wrote: > I now built OpenWrt trunk/BB r39365 with batman-adv 2013.4.0 instead of= > 2014.0.0, tried with all possible settings, no memory leak what-so-over= , happy > uptimes of more than a day by now :) > all other system components and settings are exactly identical to my pr= evious > setup with batman-adv 2014.0.0. >=20 > On 01/23/2014 04:35 AM, Daniel wrote: >> On 01/23/2014 01:10 AM, cmsv wrote: >>> what version are you using ? >=20 >> out-of-memory every 20 minutes or so on OpenWrt trunk/BB r39365 on tl-= wr841nd-v8 >> with batman-adv 2014.0.0 from openwrt's routing feed with "batman-adv:= fix >> batman-adv header overhead calculation" and "batman-adv: fix soft-inte= rface MTU >> computation" on top. >> A sample node is (occasionally) reachable via DN42 at 104.61.99.104 (f= eel free >> to ask for ssh or any kind of logs, serial access, remote gdb or whate= ver) >=20 Thanks for testing guys! I found something wrong in the code and I am going to send a patch soon. I'd really appreciate if somebody could test it! Thanks! --=20 Antonio Quartulli --hDWWdIfsMOUNd8skBmKNC3eB6GBkFMJui Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJS5RoHAAoJEEKTMo6mOh1VHtUP/0v7Ijkp6BsQAERgSipLXcH8 zFDg7OvpW/gtQ8Kp3ebT/uPQEOkku3BfEoOyVoUK/k56lRI/1DToOK/kR/1te1op TlaKJ3knj3qth6Z+QyupXopx95tnupBx/nqLqAxnRQmM7UeJ1shfq4lIDYPBlc2O DINOjWWnFMTL9uDjrWakpMHHEmxwgxUO2C+UluoEOWoH2ZZEeSFAg5caZW7vyxcB c4ELSPrGqSlplHME/8ovEvpwo5dL4lwjHitkZpPc1oRhsb6p94xV5c72mUVI/+BY mlaIIZGvXeHIHJYArj0MIQfkq7UNdoX6MFNu9AYy/XOVI4H27hv1yfYlrLXmIr6f kb6SabHBnVdfgcO9NVTio44IxPpRHAYK/u2FXXG4yNa4stjx0sS+23B9xNvQQvC6 AGSAhT+k7qAFK56KIODztfSDvluACp+EZi7kDYxfst/59eHN5cW16GRhsyf2L8gn xYvJbIU/CunGbno7ACOlyHbcLamc/6b70rn4TyOmStdA0DmQ+bPzQuKJfVy+Xueu 6JLLmZTZR7WDw28NapLowkBEC9xplyDeioxmZ4zbhGrlpoVY7M47FwNnib2gbci/ WZk3yMGpGizRj9F5AMsnIRWGXY15F8qSFr+vTf0Kcpqr9UHR+LCDHw8Iqxl8cQPo E5eofSLMZKa9o4Awxyb7 =gQ/W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hDWWdIfsMOUNd8skBmKNC3eB6GBkFMJui--