public inbox for b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@meshcoding.com>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH-maint] batman-adv: fix potential orig_node reference leak
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:45:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52FA61BD.8040304@meshcoding.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27300725.U6R9joZBFU@diderot>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1206 bytes --]

On 11/02/14 18:40, Marek Lindner wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 February 2014 18:34:10 Antonio Quartulli wrote:
>> true, but since the orig_node has not been returned yet there is no
>> other component in batman-adv which is using it.
>>
>> Otherwise, we may want to define and invoke a free_now() version of this
>> function (like we have done for other objects). But I think kfree() is
>> safe here.
> 
> It may be safe now but will surely be forgotten later. A guaranteed source for 
> trouble. That is why we have cleanup routines for everything.
> 

True, in particular because we (as bat_iv_ogm.c) do not know what
batadv_orig_node_new() has allocated - a kfree() would be fine if the
object was allocated with a plain kmalloc(), but this is not the case.

By the way we have a bug here:
if we jump to

 256 free_bcast_own:
 257         kfree(orig_node->bat_iv.bcast_own);

bcast_own gets free'd but not assigned to NULL. Later
batadv_orig_node_free_rcu() (scheduled by batadv_orig_node_free_ref())
will call batadv_iv_ogm_orig_free() that will try to kfree() bcast_own
again (line 98 in bat_iv_ogm.c), thus leading to a double free. no?


Cheers,


-- 
Antonio Quartulli


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-11 17:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-08 15:45 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH-maint] batman-adv: fix potential orig_node reference leak Simon Wunderlich
2014-02-11 12:04 ` Marek Lindner
2014-02-11 17:26 ` Antonio Quartulli
2014-02-11 17:29   ` Martin Hundebøll
2014-02-11 17:34     ` Antonio Quartulli
2014-02-11 17:40       ` Marek Lindner
2014-02-11 17:45         ` Antonio Quartulli [this message]
2014-02-11 17:35   ` Simon Wunderlich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52FA61BD.8040304@meshcoding.com \
    --to=antonio@meshcoding.com \
    --cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox