From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <52FC72F8.4080007@meshcoding.com> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:23:36 +0100 From: Antonio Quartulli MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1390299725-1873-1-git-send-email-antonio@meshcoding.com> <86mwipch0u.fsf@coulee.tdb.com> <86lhy8pn5v.fsf@coulee.tdb.com> <52DF7556.9090200@makrotopia.org> <86y527oqpl.fsf_-_@coulee.tdb.com> <52E003DD.6040302@meshcoding.com> <52E02EDC.3080805@wirelesspt.net> <86iotbo9hw.fsf@coulee.tdb.com> <52E05E0F.7010203@wirelesspt.net> <52E08DFE.9030604@makrotopia.org> <52E5063E.3080408@makrotopia.org> <52E51A04.8020800@meshcoding.com> <52E5322D.60202@wirelesspt.net> <52E532D0.2000907@meshcoding.com> <52E5341F.30800@meshcoding.com> <52E69D7D.80905@wirelesspt.net> <861tzsgaub.fsf@coulee.tdb.com> <52E70836.3050502@wirelesspt.net> <867g9jciol.fsf@coulee.tdb.com> <52E97715.3060306@wirelesspt.net> <52F59F90.7000204@wirelesspt.net> <52FB2186.2060701@meshcoding.com> <52FB4F8C.908@wirelesspt.net> <52FB5DD6.8050004@meshcoding.com> <52FC17FF.6070100@wirelesspt.net> In-Reply-To: <52FC17FF.6070100@wirelesspt.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mouLid1qxFhPj2waWFDWodQ8bjJ6VvWtU" Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman-adv: memory leak? Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: cmsv@wirelesspt.net, The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --mouLid1qxFhPj2waWFDWodQ8bjJ6VvWtU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 13/02/14 01:55, cmsv wrote: > I have noticed a few patches being sent but unless i missing something > they are all for the development branch. No, most of them are for the maint branch (thus the 2014.0.0 branch). > Next week i will be deploying new firmware and create new access points= > and cannot afford "testing" on production environment. I understand. but if you could give it a try before leaving it would be nice! :) Thanks a lot anyway! --=20 Antonio Quartulli --mouLid1qxFhPj2waWFDWodQ8bjJ6VvWtU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJS/HL8AAoJEEKTMo6mOh1VaREP/jNiMUPwdGO0onJTF0bfXxzq ksyH2EiqVHcLxGj0y9GiVlYeieLGFzVRoQgw1bsPD3XIXjNVXDrFctc9ritmMDQN 7cCvqAFwZzp20/j6K7Oao2tk8eN2iifvPArrkE1FU2QZ1WDrI3wDizc6wzBdXJOb IC4/8EXucGUj3ppXXS5Mqq54E/Tvw9vuX2moaDRpJ31dV7cg0MpSua7WlBJ1kMSa E0zj6dO6Db/LXbSQ/jfB5IuxWJG1zYFfkuGokQ8iZ2HYYRq3U7J9v4NVa4+XYROg AR6/yCOzGueYuTMdTw9JaBkIsQ0fhxjxTLH1p1vqDTcuHvxj+gvP1sfmegeuXWQr ZppcVbZymgWt5jfzaK8z66DufpRJuIHpbQL5BowsBV5cNfp6kKtTl0EE55Z+tRlU GiiAz5RoW33BGNDoBOwGh5o6XsSxmb7ju3ak8gf1WtyY1yjXEGZzybMZTiO4sC99 I+dWGybCbI0jjWNePgDjqszcwLXkFDcPJZ7fDdfnpoNxL8fk18YfT08rSdjoqh82 A2ljkvY65KX8pdMBVNHvenubXbUErgb21HMf3J6BWTD4humK88u6MOQRJgB9U6MF LEa6O5JjgFd2nW5FqQs/Fc8r4YN3gnKqMsu2udBgj3OH+dD9QejzKMwJi8KLZyaK ltZtVXR/p5UxrbPeaeJP =6QyE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mouLid1qxFhPj2waWFDWodQ8bjJ6VvWtU--