On 17/06/15 14:09, Marek Lindner wrote:
> The tt_local_entry deletion performed batadv_tt_local_remove() was neither
> protecting against simultaneous deletes nor checking whether the element
> was still part of the list before calling hlist_del_rcu().
> 
> Replacing the hlist_del_rcu() with batadv_hash_remove() provides adequate
> protection via hash spinlocks as well as a is-element-still-in-hash check.
> 
> Reported-by: alfonsname@web.de
> Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner <mareklindner@neomailbox.ch>

Acked-by: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@meshcoding.com>

Thanks!

-- 
Antonio Quartulli