* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Fwd: MTU problem
[not found] ` <CANC9+Djjuo3pvuwAUfFmPCM8KAxDXro8SeubMrdy9QB4ewgTjg@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2015-11-04 11:21 ` Martin Hundebøll
2015-11-04 11:31 ` Simon Wunderlich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Martin Hundebøll @ 2015-11-04 11:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Antonio Abejaro; +Cc: b.a.t.m.a.n
Hi Antonio,
Please direct your mails to the batman mailing list:
b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
This way, others can help you too.
On 2015-11-04 12:15, Antonio Abejaro wrote:
> I have just configured the value of 1532 for MTU in /etc/config/network
> as suggested but when I reboot my node I obtain the following dmesg:
>
> batman_adv: bat0: The MTU of interface adhoc0 is too small (1500) to
> handle the transport of batman-adv packets. Packets going over this
> interface will be fragmented on layer2 which could impact the
> performance. Setting the MTU to 1532 would solve the problem.
What version of b.a.t.m.a.n. are you using? We had an issue in earlier
version, where the suggested value was too small...
// Martin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Fwd: MTU problem
2015-11-04 11:21 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Fwd: MTU problem Martin Hundebøll
@ 2015-11-04 11:31 ` Simon Wunderlich
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Simon Wunderlich @ 2015-11-04 11:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: b.a.t.m.a.n; +Cc: Martin Hundebøll
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 914 bytes --]
He also wrote me in private ... that's kind of rude :(
On Wednesday 04 November 2015 12:21:20 Martin Hundebøll wrote:
> Hi Antonio,
>
> Please direct your mails to the batman mailing list:
> b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
>
> This way, others can help you too.
>
> On 2015-11-04 12:15, Antonio Abejaro wrote:
> > I have just configured the value of 1532 for MTU in /etc/config/network
> > as suggested but when I reboot my node I obtain the following dmesg:
> >
> > batman_adv: bat0: The MTU of interface adhoc0 is too small (1500) to
> > handle the transport of batman-adv packets. Packets going over this
> > interface will be fragmented on layer2 which could impact the
> > performance. Setting the MTU to 1532 would solve the problem.
>
> What version of b.a.t.m.a.n. are you using? We had an issue in earlier
> version, where the suggested value was too small...
>
> // Martin
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-11-04 11:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CANC9+Di3GnouTrYDsp0ihbAFAV9xahr9T88KdqTBuK_nV6xUGw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CANC9+Djjuo3pvuwAUfFmPCM8KAxDXro8SeubMrdy9QB4ewgTjg@mail.gmail.com>
2015-11-04 11:21 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Fwd: MTU problem Martin Hundebøll
2015-11-04 11:31 ` Simon Wunderlich
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox