Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Fwd: MTU problem

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Fwd: MTU problem

[Martin Hundebøll]

Hi Antonio,

Please direct your mails to the batman mailing list:
b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org

This way, others can help you too.

On 2015-11-04 12:15, Antonio Abejaro wrote:
> I have just configured the value of 1532 for MTU in /etc/config/network
> as suggested but when I reboot my node I obtain the following dmesg:
>
> batman_adv: bat0: The MTU of interface adhoc0 is too small (1500) to
> handle the transport of batman-adv packets. Packets going over this
> interface will be fragmented on layer2 which could impact the
> performance. Setting the MTU to 1532 would solve the problem.

What version of b.a.t.m.a.n. are you using? We had an issue in earlier 
version, where the suggested value was too small...

// Martin

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Fwd: MTU problem

[Simon Wunderlich]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 914 bytes --]

He also wrote me in private ... that's kind of rude :(

On Wednesday 04 November 2015 12:21:20 Martin Hundebøll wrote:
> Hi Antonio,
> 
> Please direct your mails to the batman mailing list:
> b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
> 
> This way, others can help you too.
> 
> On 2015-11-04 12:15, Antonio Abejaro wrote:
> > I have just configured the value of 1532 for MTU in /etc/config/network
> > as suggested but when I reboot my node I obtain the following dmesg:
> > 
> > batman_adv: bat0: The MTU of interface adhoc0 is too small (1500) to
> > handle the transport of batman-adv packets. Packets going over this
> > interface will be fragmented on layer2 which could impact the
> > performance. Setting the MTU to 1532 would solve the problem.
> 
> What version of b.a.t.m.a.n. are you using? We had an issue in earlier
> version, where the suggested value was too small...
> 
> // Martin

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]