Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] no able to switch routing algo to V ?

contact
2016-05-07T18:45:27Z

it seems table, I saw a really fast dynamic route creation. With batman
IV the route took sometime 1 min to come and it was really noisy, i
tried many settings,
here with V it is good, when I move toward a node it took less than 1
sec to create a new route and the video stream is not interrupted.

Sometime I loose the route it become a little bit noisy when I stop
moving but here I suspect a wifi problem, need to change my channel.

I will make more test by adding other nodes on the path of the robot and
see how routing is done.

Thank you all :-)

On 07/05/2016 20:09, contact wrote:
> I flashed 3 nodes (2 fixe and 1 mobile streaming 2mbits of video data)
> ,no crash for the moment.
>
> I am making some test to see if all is ok.
>
> Laurent
>
> On 07/05/2016 19:06, contact wrote:
>> seems ok , I will give a try
>> (I came today at work only to do some mesh testing on moving robots
>> :-) , never have the time during the week ...)
>>
>> user@ubuntuvm:~/openwrt15011/openwrt$ git -C feeds/routing log
>> commit a3cd8a1729779b8a39336a863ba7f97481e81f5c
>> Author: Marek Lindner <mareklindner@neomailbox.ch>
>> Date: Sat May 7 20:42:44 2016 +0800
>>
>> batman-adv: 2016.1 bugfixes & stability updates
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner <mareklindner@neomailbox.ch>
>>
>> commit 16ceff232dc58aad799bbb3d98915eb5c78ec2af
>> Author: Axel Neumann <neumann@cgws.de>
>> Date: Fri May 6 10:35:47 2016 +0200
>>
>> bmx7: bump version (report channel via topology plugin)
>>
>>
>> On 07/05/2016 19:01, Marek Lindner wrote:
>>> On Saturday, May 07, 2016 18:59:14 contact wrote:
>>>> I just updated I need to recompile and re-flash my nodes it takes
>>>> sometime, can you check please if all your patches are here ?
>>>>
>>>> [..]
>>>>
>>>> Fast-forward
>>>> ...make-sure-ELP-OGM-orig-MAC-is-updated-on-.patch | 64
>>>> ++++++++++++
>>>> ...-adv-Avoid-duplicate-neigh_node-additions.patch | 89
>>>> +++++++++++++++++
>>>> ...Avoid-nullptr-derefence-in-batadv_v_neigh.patch | 38 +++++++
>>>> ...an-adv-Fix-refcnt-leak-in-batadv_v_neigh_.patch | 81
>>>> +++++++++++++++
>>>> ...Fix-double-neigh_node_put-in-batadv_v_ogm.patch | 40 ++++++++
>>>> ...initialize-ELP-orig-address-on-secondary-.patch | 110
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Looks good. However, comparing git revisions (as Sven suggested) is
>>> more
>>> precise than posting such logs.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Marek
>>
>>
>
>