Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] i have a question ? How many relay nodes can be supported at NetworkCoding ( mtu 1546 ) .

[johnzeng <johnzeng2013@yahoo.com>]

Hello Dear Linus:

                            Ok , i see , i will test it in according to 
your advisement .


                            Thanks , have a good day with you


                            Tiger



于 2016年11月09日 13:28, Linus Lüssing 写道:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 04:50:45AM +0100, johnzeng via B.A.T.M.A.N wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2016 11:50:30 +0800
>> From: johnzeng <johnzeng2013@yahoo.com>
>> To: Simon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de>
>> CC: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org, Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>,
>>   Martin Hundebøll <martin@hundeboll.net>
>> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] i have a question ? How many relay nodes can be
>>   supported at NetworkCoding ( mtu 1546 ) .
>>
>>                               I can understand network coding , it will be
>> same as proxy or Intermediator at Layer 2 ,
> Maybe there is a complete misunderstanding what "network coding"
> is?
>
> Maybe an easier expression would be "packet mixing" or "magic packet
> mangling" [1].
>
> Any code that does something with networking is usually *not*
> "network coding" (at least in this context here).
>
> Have a look at the links Sven has provided earlier.
>
>>
>>                              Your meaning :  Batman-adv can build Similar
>> mechanism ( Intermediator )  via intermediator , it wil be  relay based real
>> application packet ( not relay based Broadcast packet)
> Just try it :-). Compile batman-adv *without network coding* with
> your A-B-C scenario and see how it magically works, too :-).
>
> Regards, Linus
>
>
> [1]: Please no expert hit me :D. I know, ultimately, network coding would
> replace packet based networks, if I remember Frank's talk
> in Leipzig correctly
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yluj7e_rfVE