From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <5822BB41.7060305@yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2016 13:59:29 +0800 From: johnzeng MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] i have a question ? How many relay nodes can be supported at NetworkCoding ( mtu 1546 ) . References: <581C7F4A.80104@yahoo.com> <2907018.3yHk8Vyvxo@sven-edge> <23104849.8bNq0ZtGq3@prime> <20161109052815.GG3391@otheros> In-Reply-To: <20161109052815.GG3391@otheros> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?TGludXMgTMO8c3Npbmc=?= Cc: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking Hello Dear Linus: Ok , i see , i will test it in according to your advisement . Thanks , have a good day with you Tiger 于 2016年11月09日 13:28, Linus Lüssing 写道: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 04:50:45AM +0100, johnzeng via B.A.T.M.A.N wrote: >> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2016 11:50:30 +0800 >> From: johnzeng >> To: Simon Wunderlich >> CC: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org, Sven Eckelmann , >> Martin Hundebøll >> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] i have a question ? How many relay nodes can be >> supported at NetworkCoding ( mtu 1546 ) . >> >> I can understand network coding , it will be >> same as proxy or Intermediator at Layer 2 , > Maybe there is a complete misunderstanding what "network coding" > is? > > Maybe an easier expression would be "packet mixing" or "magic packet > mangling" [1]. > > Any code that does something with networking is usually *not* > "network coding" (at least in this context here). > > Have a look at the links Sven has provided earlier. > >> >> Your meaning : Batman-adv can build Similar >> mechanism ( Intermediator ) via intermediator , it wil be relay based real >> application packet ( not relay based Broadcast packet) > Just try it :-). Compile batman-adv *without network coding* with > your A-B-C scenario and see how it magically works, too :-). > > Regards, Linus > > > [1]: Please no expert hit me :D. I know, ultimately, network coding would > replace packet based networks, if I remember Frank's talk > in Leipzig correctly > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yluj7e_rfVE