public inbox for b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 0/9] batctl: relax root privileges check
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:49:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <74264595.mJidA94r61@prime> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3266034.EiLA6asg3G@sven-edge>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1284 bytes --]

On Sunday, January 22, 2017 1:20:42 PM CET Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> batctl has a "root" user check since the beginning of this tool. It even got
> a TODO comment in 58525b8330e9 ("batctl: adjust vis.c coding style"):
> 
>     /* TODO: remove this generic check here and move it into the individual
> functions */
> 
> This patchset is now trying to resolve this TODO.
> 
>  * batctl: Move root privileges check in separate function
>  * batctl: Use geteuid for checks of root privileges
>  * batctl: Return type of error on netlink_get_info error
>  * batctl: Make root privileges check function specific
>  * batctl: Allow to retrieve interface stats as non-root
>  * batctl: Allow to read loglevel as normal user
>  * batctl: Allow to read gw_mode as normal user
>  * batctl: Allow to read sysfs settings as normal user
>  * batctl: Allow to read list of interfaces as normal user
> 
> "Return type of error on netlink_get_info error" may look a little bit odd
> in this list. But it was required in my initial test to avoid that
> "originators" and "gwl" try to start a debugfs access when the netlink
> function should have returned a "-EPERM" (but did return a -EOPNOTSUPP).
> 
> Kind regards,
> 	Sven

I've adopted this series into 91b23ca..515cf78.

Thanks!!
     Simon

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-01-24 12:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-22 12:20 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 0/9] batctl: relax root privileges check Sven Eckelmann
2017-01-22 12:21 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 1/9] batctl: Move root privileges check in separate function Sven Eckelmann
2017-01-22 12:21 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 2/9] batctl: Use geteuid for checks of root privileges Sven Eckelmann
2017-01-22 12:21 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 3/9] batctl: Return type of error on netlink_get_info error Sven Eckelmann
2017-01-22 12:21 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 4/9] batctl: Make root privileges check function specific Sven Eckelmann
2017-01-22 12:21 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 5/9] batctl: Allow to retrieve interface stats as non-root Sven Eckelmann
2017-01-22 12:21 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 6/9] batctl: Allow to read loglevel as normal user Sven Eckelmann
2017-01-22 12:21 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 7/9] batctl: Allow to read gw_mode " Sven Eckelmann
2017-01-22 12:21 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 8/9] batctl: Allow to read sysfs settings " Sven Eckelmann
2017-01-22 12:21 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 9/9] batctl: Allow to read list of interfaces " Sven Eckelmann
2017-01-24 12:49 ` Simon Wunderlich [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=74264595.mJidA94r61@prime \
    --to=sw@simonwunderlich.de \
    --cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox