From: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCHv2] batman-adv: fix visualization output without neighbors on the primary interface
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 08:43:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7772207.d3Er5W7jJA@bentobox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FA75113.40401@universe-factory.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1326 bytes --]
On Monday, May 07, 2012 06:35:31 AM Matthias Schiffer wrote:
[....]
> I have some questions about the code though:
>
> - Is there any reason vis_seq_print_text() allocates a buffer at all instead
> of just printing the data directy into the seq_file? Looking at the
> seq_printf implementation, there doesn't seem to be a problem calling it
> while holding the lock.
This is something which came from an old... old... old implementation. It
didn't use debugfs and seq_printf and therefore stupid tricks had to be used.
Actually, the current implementation is broken and has to be changed (but no
one wanted to touch the vis code).
> - In many places in the vis code
> hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() is used to iterate over the hash lists, even
> though all access to vis_hash is guarded by the vis_hash_lock, so it seems
> to be okay to just use hlist_for_each_entry(). In some functions,
> vis_seq_print_text() being one of them, rcu_read_lock/unlock pairs could be
> removed as well with this change. Do I overlook something?
I think it would be better to reduce the spin-locking and change the code to
use rcu_read_lock. But maybe we have to think a lot about the data structures
to generate consistent output... so maybe it is not possible (when also
wanting it implemented in an efficient way).
Kind regards,
Sven
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-07 6:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-05 15:05 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: fix visualization output without neighbors on the primary interface Matthias Schiffer
2012-05-05 15:29 ` Sven Eckelmann
2012-05-05 15:49 ` Matthias Schiffer
2012-05-05 15:51 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCHv2] " Matthias Schiffer
2012-05-06 20:14 ` Simon Wunderlich
2012-05-07 4:35 ` Matthias Schiffer
2012-05-07 6:40 ` Marek Lindner
2012-05-07 11:10 ` Matthias Schiffer
2012-05-07 11:28 ` Sven Eckelmann
2012-05-08 6:04 ` Marek Lindner
2012-05-08 12:51 ` Matthias Schiffer
2012-05-08 20:52 ` Guido Iribarren
2012-05-09 11:33 ` Marek Lindner
2012-05-09 16:10 ` Martin Hundebøll
2012-05-10 19:47 ` Matthias Schiffer
2012-05-10 20:19 ` Marek Lindner
2012-05-10 20:46 ` Matthias Schiffer
2012-05-07 6:43 ` Sven Eckelmann [this message]
2012-05-07 6:43 ` Marek Lindner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7772207.d3Er5W7jJA@bentobox \
--to=sven@narfation.org \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox