From: "zb1981gm"<zb80211@gmail.com>
To: "b.a.t.m.a.n" <b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Subject: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] about batman performance
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 17:01:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM__111206165734_29183085106@smtp.gmail.com> (raw)
I have used batman on my project for several months.It performs very well,stable especially!
But,actually,I am not satisfied with the performance of Batman.I found that the bandwidth would drop sharply with the wireless hop increase.
Now I provide my test result here:
routerA and routerB is composed of compex wp543ahv mainboard (AR7161 platform) and two AR9220 wireless card.Firmware is Openwrt backfire.
one card is working on 2.4G channel as AP mode,the other is working on 5G channel as mesh backbone
batman version:2.0
notebook1 and notebook2 is equiped with 802.11n usb wireless card which access to the AP mode card of routerA and routerB
channel 1 channel 36 channel 11
notebook1 --------------- routerA -------------- routerB -------------- notebook2
I use iperf to test bandwidth
notebook1 ----------- routerA 45Mbps
routerA ----------- routerB 46Mbps
routerB ----------- notebook2 45Mbps
But the bandwidth between notebook1 and notebook2 remains 8Mbps
bandwidth between notebook1 and routerB remain 18Mbps
So the conclution is that the bandwidth will be halfed with the 1 hop increase! right?
I also found that the interface alternating mode and bonding mode doesn't take effect
channel 1
routerA ------------------ routerB
channel 36
The test result is no difference whatever I configured alternating or bonding or just single radio
According to the batman official site, alternating or bonding mode would improve the performance compared with the single radio mode
looking forward somebody's help
highly appreciated!
next reply other threads:[~2011-12-06 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-06 9:01 zb1981gm [this message]
2011-12-06 9:46 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] about batman performance Simon Wunderlich
2011-12-06 10:23 ` Wuchi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-12-07 14:00 zb1981gm
2011-12-07 15:34 ` Sven Eckelmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM__111206165734_29183085106@smtp.gmail.com \
--to=zb80211@gmail.com \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox