From: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
To: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bitbake/utils: 'Fix' bb.utils.contains() behaviour
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 20:20:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311650440.2260.12.camel@scimitar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311617994.2344.194.camel@rex>
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 19:19 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> Currently bb.utils.contains(X, "A", true, false) will return true for substring matches,
> e.g. if X = "ABC". This is not what most users expect from the function.
>
> In the common OE use of this function there is the case of "touchscreen" and "screen" being
> used as independent variables. Whilst it could be argued there isn't a problem in that
> specific case (touchscreens are usually on screens), there is no substring usage of this
> function is OE-Core so this patch changes the behaviour to match only full strings.
>
> It also fixes a bug where duplicate entries would confuse multiple matches, e.g.
> contains(X, ["A", "B"], ...) would match X = "A A" which is clearly wrong.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/bitbake/lib/bb/utils.py b/bitbake/lib/bb/utils.py
> index 075ca88..4eac285 100644
> --- a/lib/bb/utils.py
> +++ b/lib/bb/utils.py
> @@ -861,12 +861,11 @@ def contains(variable, checkvalues, truevalue, falsevalue, d):
> val = d.getVar(variable, True)
> if not val:
> return falsevalue
> - matches = 0
> - if type(checkvalues).__name__ == "str":
> - checkvalues = [checkvalues]
> - for value in checkvalues:
> - if val.find(value) != -1:
> - matches = matches + 1
> - if matches == len(checkvalues):
> + val = set(val.split())
> + if isinstance(checkvalues, basestring):
> + checkvalues = set(checkvalues.split())
> + else:
> + checkvalues = set(checkvalues)
> + if checkvalues.issubset(val):
> return truevalue
> return falsevalue
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitbake-devel mailing list
> bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bitbake-devel
--
Joshua Lock
Yocto Project "Johannes factotum"
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-26 3:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-25 18:19 [PATCH] bitbake/utils: 'Fix' bb.utils.contains() behaviour Richard Purdie
2011-07-26 3:20 ` Joshua Lock [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1311650440.2260.12.camel@scimitar \
--to=josh@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox