From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QrexR-00069w-2q for bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 01:46:37 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7BNg3k7003051; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:42:03 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 02427-05; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:41:59 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7BNfunW003045 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:41:56 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Joshua Lock In-Reply-To: <1313103490.2506.2.camel@vorpal.jf.intel.com> References: <1313103490.2506.2.camel@vorpal.jf.intel.com> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:41:18 +0100 Message-ID: <1313106078.14274.476.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Bug fixing and code clarity X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 23:46:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 15:58 -0700, Joshua Lock wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 18:19 -0700, Joshua Lock wrote: > > The following series addresses some thinko/typo's I'd introduced to hob, by > > using variable names which are too similar, as well as adding some changes > > to increase clarity in various places. > > This series rolled into a new series submitted just now, please ignore > this series. I've actually already merged this series. Was there any change in the newer version I should be looking for? Cheers, Richard