From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sgkbc-0001sp-3O for bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:39:32 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q5IMSnoM015922; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 23:28:49 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 11609-03; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 23:28:42 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q5IMSblP015875 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 18 Jun 2012 23:28:38 +0100 Message-ID: <1340058517.1640.8.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Mark Hatle Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 23:28:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4FDF99FB.2030503@windriver.com> References: <4FDF99FB.2030503@windriver.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: is there a bitbake command to *just* fetch all necessary packages? X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 22:39:32 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 16:13 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 6/18/12 4:08 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > >> > >> perhaps i'm just misreading the docs, but is there a bitbake > >> incantation that does *nothing* more than fetch the packages needed > >> for a target image? > >> > >> if i use "bitbake -c fetchall", the result is not just to fetch the > >> source, but to unload and patch it as well. > > > > hmmm I thought it did just what it says 'fetch all' but as you say it > > seems to do more hmm I am not sure if its intended behavior > > In order for fetchall to work, there are a few dependencies that have to be > executed as well.. > > But bitbake -c fetchall , will fetch everything needed for the > recipe. It will extract and build only the items necessary for fetch to work > properly. So just to be clear, the issues are git-native, potentially subversion-native and also potentially pseudo-native getting built by the wrapper. If you add those to ASSUME_PROVIDED, and skip the wrapper, to avoid pseudo-native (or teach the wrapper to pass through -c fetchall directly?) it will just fetch. Cheers, Richard