From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Cc: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] process.py, build.py: Fix log truncation problems with flush()
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:12:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1340295159.1640.132.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FE34628.5060009@windriver.com>
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 11:04 -0500, Jason Wessel wrote:
> On 06/21/2012 10:55 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 09:58 -0500, Jason Wessel wrote:
> >> There are two problems with the _logged_communicate that are both
> >> caused as a result of buffering I/O, instead of flushing it out to the
> >> log files as it arrives.
> >>
> >> 1) log truncation when python dumps
> >> I have seen the task logs missing data that was not flushed when
> >> bitbake crashes.
> >>
> >> 2) While a bitbake task is running it is impossible to see what is
> >> going on if it is only writing a small incremental log that is
> >> smaller than the buffer, or you get only a partial log, up until
> >> the task exists. It is worse in the case that stderr and stdout
> >> are separate file handles, because previous code blocks on the read
> >> of stdout and then stderr, serially.
> >>
> >> The right approach is simply to use select() to determine if there is
> >> data available and then to flush the log buffers as they arrive. This
> >> still makes use of buffering in the cases where there is more than 1
> >> byte of data, but the buffers are much more dynamic.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
> >> ---
> >> lib/bb/build.py | 3 ++-
> >> lib/bb/process.py | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > For what its worth I'm seeing a small but consistent increase in real,
> > sys and user times with this patch which is why I'm pausing to look at
> > it a little further :(
>
>
> In my experience, it varied quite a bit. If need be, we simply allow
> allow a config variable like BB_FORCE_LOG_FLUSH = "1", and get rid of
> the flushes by default.
>
> At the distro level, I'll turn this on, but still allow users to
> override it, because timely logging of builds is critical, and loss of
> data due to a python crash is completely unacceptable, it just makes
> build failures even harder to diagnose.
Python has some better tools to handle things like this, such as
something like:
try:
<normal case>
finally:
x.flush()
so it would be interesting to see if that helps.
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-21 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-14 14:58 [PATCH 0/1] process.py, build.py: Fix log truncation problems with flush() Jason Wessel
2012-06-14 14:58 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Jason Wessel
2012-06-21 15:55 ` Richard Purdie
2012-06-21 16:04 ` Jason Wessel
2012-06-21 16:12 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2012-06-21 16:26 ` Jason Wessel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1340295159.1640.132.camel@ted \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox