Openembedded Bitbake Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
Cc: "Zongchun.Yu@freescale.com" <Zongchun.Yu@freescale.com>,
	"B40290@freescale.com" <B40290@freescale.com>,
	"ting.liu@freescale.com" <ting.liu@freescale.com>,
	"bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org"
	<bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org>,
	Richard Schmitt <richard.schmitt@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bitbake: fetch2/git: Add sanity check for SHA validity of tag
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 12:43:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1389184991.6899.95.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140108113213.GV3709@jama>

On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 12:32 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > [Luo Zhenhua-B19537] You point is to show warning when SRCREV and tag are set, meanwhile SRCREV is not corresponding to the tag, right?
> 
> Yes

We have several different issues around and the moment and I'm worried
some cases are going to get lost. We really need a list of them along
with the planed fix. As I see it we have:

a) conflicting SRCREV and tag/rev url parameters

Plan: bb.error on this case asking the user to say what they want

b) dereferencing of tags when checking existance of commits

Plan: Add ^{} to ls-remote command to allow dereferencing

c) tags may get resolved to incorrect tags in sub directories

Plan: Need to anchor tag/branch search expression


What else are we missing?


Ideally we could do with examples of these in the fetcher test code
too...

Cheers,

Richard






  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-08 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-24  8:06 [PATCH 0/2] bitbake: fetch2: Add sanity check for SHA validity of tag and adjust SHA define order Zhenhua Luo
2013-12-24  8:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] bitbake: fetch2/git: Add sanity check for SHA validity of tag Zhenhua Luo
2014-01-03 13:43   ` Martin Jansa
2014-01-06  4:25     ` zhenhua.luo
2014-01-06  9:12       ` Martin Jansa
2014-01-07  3:29         ` zhenhua.luo
2014-01-07 14:46           ` Martin Jansa
2014-01-08 10:21             ` zhenhua.luo
2014-01-08 11:32               ` Martin Jansa
2014-01-08 12:43                 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2014-01-20 21:14                   ` Richard Purdie
2013-12-24  8:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] bitbake: fetch2: adjust the priority of revision definition Zhenhua Luo
2014-01-03  2:12 ` [PATCH 0/2] bitbake: fetch2: Add sanity check for SHA validity of tag and adjust SHA define order zhenhua.luo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1389184991.6899.95.camel@ted \
    --to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=B40290@freescale.com \
    --cc=Zongchun.Yu@freescale.com \
    --cc=bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
    --cc=richard.schmitt@freescale.com \
    --cc=ting.liu@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox