From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org,
Aleh Arol <aleh.arol@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: source folder package dependency
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:37:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2370505.PRl1Ey1z8e@helios> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F26B9D3.9010709@gmail.com>
On Monday 30 January 2012 18:40:03 Aleh Arol wrote:
> I have a question I don't know how to solve:
> I have a library, for example, boost, and a part of that
> library(packaged together I mean), like bjam is required to build it.
>
> So I have boost-X.Y.Z.bb recipe and src/boost-X.Y.Z folder(I have
> sources locally) and I need to create bjam recipe. I can make
> bjam-X.Y.Z.bb where I will refer to folder src/boost-${PV} as ${SRC_URI}
> and ${S} to find jam sources under. Then if I'll need to have 5
> different versions of boost I'll need to create 5 different versions of
> bjam recipe.... although I can use bjam.inc it will still be 5 bjam recipes.
>
> How can I avoid that? Any way to have a version agnostic bjam recipe? Or the
> right way of doing this.
(I presume this is in the context of OpenEmbedded.) What you describe is the
accepted way of doing things - you have a recipe for each version of the piece
of software you're building and share the common things with a .inc file, using
${PV} to abstract away the version. Each individual recipe ends up quite small
with the bulk of the definitions in the inc file.
You could have a recipe which did not specify a version in the recipe filename,
and set PV manually instead (possibly with a default); then you could set
PV_pn-bjam = "1.1" in your distro or local configuration to pick the version.
However I would describe that as unorthodox, and it will not work if you have
to handle other differences between versions (e.g. renamed/moved files,
additional configuration options, etc.) I will say however that this is more or
less how we handle recipes built from a version control system (e.g. git);
except in that case we set PV to something including SRCREV e.g.
"1.0+gitr${SRCPV}" and then set SRCREV externally.
The question is will you really need 5 different versions? Or just 2-3?
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-01 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-30 15:40 source folder package dependency Aleh Arol
2012-02-01 15:37 ` Paul Eggleton [this message]
2012-02-01 20:48 ` Aleh Arol
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2370505.PRl1Ey1z8e@helios \
--to=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aleh.arol@gmail.com \
--cc=bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox